KTEC vs. PBW ETF Comparison

Comparison of KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF (KTEC) to PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio (PBW)
KTEC

KraneShares Hang Seng TECH Index ETF

KTEC Description

KTEC is passively managed to provide exposure to the 30 largest Chinese technology companies listed in Hong Kong. The fund selects companies headquartered and operating primarily in Greater China (Hong Kong, Macau, and Mainland China). Companies should be in the industrials, consumer discretionary, health care, financials, or information technology sectors. These companies should also display strong research and development investment and high revenue growth under the following themes: internet, fintech, cloud computing, e-commerce, and digital technology. KTEC primarily invests in H-shares, but also includes the other major share classes like A, B, and N-shares, red chips, P and S-chips. The index is market-cap-weighted with an 8% cap limit per individual security. Holdings are rebalanced quarterly and reconstituted at least semi-annually.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$11.60

Average Daily Volume

7,389

Number of Holdings *

8

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PBW

PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio

PBW Description The PowerShares WilderHill Clean Energy Portfolio (Fund) is based on the WilderHill Clean Energy Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to deliver capital appreciation through the selection of companies that focus on greener and generally renewable sources of energy and technologies that facilitate cleaner energy. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$20.16

Average Daily Volume

275,603

Number of Holdings *

59

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period KTEC PBW
30 Days 8.73% -11.73%
60 Days 8.65% -11.74%
90 Days 16.79% -15.77%
12 Months -1.80% -41.26%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in KTEC Weight in PBW Overlap
NIO F 0.25% 1.38% 0.25%
XPEV F 2.34% 1.26% 1.26%
KTEC Overweight 6 Positions Relative to PBW
Symbol Grade Weight
BABA C 7.8%
LI F 5.38%
BIDU D 4.02%
TCOM A 3.98%
BILI B 1.43%
WB D 0.02%
KTEC Underweight 57 Positions Relative to PBW
Symbol Grade Weight
FSLR A -2.18%
FLNC B -1.9%
MP C -1.89%
SLDP D -1.88%
ORA F -1.83%
BELFB D -1.74%
JKS D -1.73%
ESE B -1.71%
ARRY F -1.7%
AMRC D -1.69%
FREY F -1.69%
ITRI A -1.69%
BE D -1.66%
PWR A -1.61%
MYRG B -1.6%
AEIS D -1.6%
SLI F -1.58%
ALB F -1.57%
PLPC D -1.56%
THRM D -1.56%
ENPH D -1.56%
JOBY D -1.56%
QS F -1.56%
TSLA D -1.56%
WBX D -1.55%
OLED D -1.54%
PLL F -1.52%
SEDG F -1.46%
AMPS F -1.45%
SQM F -1.45%
CSIQ F -1.44%
WOLF F -1.43%
AMSC C -1.41%
BLNK F -1.38%
RNW F -1.35%
SES F -1.33%
RIVN F -1.32%
LNZA F -1.31%
ACHR D -1.3%
STEM F -1.3%
RUN F -1.27%
FCEL F -1.24%
PSNY F -1.23%
LEV F -1.23%
ENVX F -1.21%
NOVA F -1.2%
NAAS F -1.16%
NRGV F -1.13%
PLUG F -1.13%
CHPT F -1.12%
SHLS F -1.11%
EOSE F -1.08%
AMPX F -0.96%
SPWR F -0.95%
SOL F -0.53%
TPIC F -0.48%
MAXN F -0.31%
Compare ETFs