ITB vs. ZIG ETF Comparison
Comparison of iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF (ITB) to The Acquirers Fund (ZIG)
ITB
iShares U.S. Home Construction ETF
ITB Description
The investment seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. equities in the home construction sector. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its assets in securities of the underlying index and in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. It seeks to track the investment results of the Dow Jones U.S. Select Home Construction Index (the "underlying index"), which measures the performance of the home construction sector of the U.S. equity market. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$117.15
Average Daily Volume
1,628,664
44
ZIG
The Acquirers Fund
ZIG Description
The investment seeks capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities (or depositary receipts) of companies in developed markets outside the United States based on the results of a proprietary, quantitative model (the "EquBot Model") developed by the adviser that runs on the Watson™ platform. Its investment adviser is a technology based company focused on applying artificial intelligence ("AI") based solutions to investment analyses. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$38.93
Average Daily Volume
3,059
30
Performance
| Period | ITB | ZIG |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -7.30% | -0.65% |
| 60 Days | -3.07% | 0.41% |
| 90 Days | 1.19% | 3.81% |
| 12 Months | 49.47% | 25.62% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in ITB | Weight in ZIG | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLDR | F | 2.95% | 2.96% | 2.95% |
ITB Overweight 43 Positions Relative to ZIG
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| DHI | D | 14.72% | |
| LEN | D | 11.67% | |
| NVR | D | 7.99% | |
| PHM | D | 7.74% | |
| LOW | B | 4.77% | |
| HD | B | 4.73% | |
| TOL | C | 4.25% | |
| SHW | D | 4.23% | |
| BLD | F | 3.06% | |
| LII | B | 2.77% | |
| MAS | D | 2.52% | |
| OC | B | 2.22% | |
| TMHC | A | 1.96% | |
| MTH | D | 1.85% | |
| KBH | D | 1.56% | |
| FND | D | 1.55% | |
| FBIN | C | 1.52% | |
| IBP | F | 1.48% | |
| EXP | B | 1.36% | |
| SKY | C | 1.3% | |
| MHO | D | 1.21% | |
| MHK | D | 1.11% | |
| UFPI | C | 1.11% | |
| SSD | F | 1.07% | |
| TPH | D | 1.05% | |
| TREX | B | 0.97% | |
| CVCO | A | 0.94% | |
| AZEK | C | 0.86% | |
| BECN | B | 0.81% | |
| CCS | F | 0.71% | |
| GRBK | D | 0.64% | |
| LGIH | F | 0.59% | |
| LEN | D | 0.5% | |
| MBC | B | 0.32% | |
| HAYW | A | 0.3% | |
| DFH | F | 0.25% | |
| BZH | D | 0.24% | |
| LEG | F | 0.23% | |
| NX | C | 0.2% | |
| AMWD | D | 0.2% | |
| JELD | F | 0.17% | |
| ETD | F | 0.09% | |
| ARHS | F | 0.07% |
ITB Underweight 29 Positions Relative to ZIG
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CALM | B | -3.89% | |
| UI | A | -3.89% | |
| TPL | A | -3.82% | |
| MLI | A | -3.63% | |
| STLD | A | -3.57% | |
| SYF | B | -3.56% | |
| HCC | A | -3.51% | |
| BK | B | -3.48% | |
| CNS | B | -3.48% | |
| YUM | D | -3.42% | |
| SLM | C | -3.41% | |
| BTU | A | -3.38% | |
| DPZ | B | -3.37% | |
| VRSN | F | -3.37% | |
| CF | B | -3.34% | |
| APAM | A | -3.34% | |
| DDS | C | -3.33% | |
| PBF | F | -3.31% | |
| CRC | B | -3.26% | |
| MO | A | -3.26% | |
| ATKR | F | -3.22% | |
| NUE | F | -3.2% | |
| LPX | D | -3.11% | |
| BCC | D | -3.11% | |
| CROX | F | -3.11% | |
| AMR | F | -3.08% | |
| STNG | F | -2.96% | |
| BPOP | F | -2.92% | |
| TRMD | F | -2.57% |
ITB: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
ZIG: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
