GPOW vs. UMI ETF Comparison

Comparison of Goldman Sachs North American Pipelines & Power Equity ETF (GPOW) to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund (UMI)
GPOW

Goldman Sachs North American Pipelines & Power Equity ETF

GPOW Description

The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in securities included in its underlying index. The index is designed to deliver exposure to equity securities of U.S. and Canadian listed companies, including companies structured as master limited partnerships, operating in the pipelines and power universe. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$44.22

Average Daily Volume

619

Number of Holdings *

7

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
UMI

USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund

UMI Description The investment seeks a high level of current income; as a secondary objective, the fund seeks capital appreciation. The fund will seek to achieve its investment objectives by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of U.S. and Canadian companies of any market capitalization deemed by the Sub-Adviser to be engaged in the midstream energy sector. It will invest more than 25% of the value of its total assets in the energy, oil, and gas industries. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$40.08

Average Daily Volume

11,119

Number of Holdings *

18

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period GPOW UMI
30 Days -0.73% -1.01%
60 Days 5.40% 5.21%
90 Days 7.23% 10.97%
12 Months 29.47%
6 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in GPOW Weight in UMI Overlap
KMI B 6.17% 4.38% 4.38%
LNG A 5.69% 4.44% 4.44%
MPLX A 3.04% 4.66% 3.04%
OKE B 6.7% 8.42% 6.7%
TRGP B 7.43% 6.14% 6.14%
WMB A 6.39% 4.55% 4.55%
Compare ETFs