GDMA vs. BAMO ETF Comparison
Comparison of Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF (GDMA) to Brookstone Opportunities ETF (BAMO)
GDMA
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
GDMA Description
The investment seeks total return. The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing (i) approximately 80% of its total assets with exposure to a variety of asset classes, geographies, and market capitalizations generally based on a long-term view of macroeconomic factors and (ii) approximately 20% of its total assets to add or reduce exposure to one or more asset classes generally based on a short-term view of the market. It may invest in futures contracts to gain long or short exposure to one or more asset classes.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$30.44
Average Daily Volume
9,728
18
BAMO
Brookstone Opportunities ETF
BAMO Description
The fund is an actively managed fund of funds that invests in unaffiliated exchange traded funds ("ETFs") purchased in the secondary market that invest in foreign and domestic stocks of any market capitalization (including emerging markets), bonds (including junk bonds) and cash and cash equivalents, including leveraged ETFs, based on the adviser"s relative outlook for those asset classes.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$27.98
Average Daily Volume
6,408
5
Performance
| Period | GDMA | BAMO |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -1.75% | -0.80% |
| 60 Days | -0.75% | -0.29% |
| 90 Days | 0.99% | 1.41% |
| 12 Months | 6.77% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in GDMA | Weight in BAMO | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGOV | B | 34.82% | 17.43% | 17.43% |
GDMA: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
BAMO: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
