CNRG vs. ERTH ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) to Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH)

CNRG

SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF

CNRG Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Clean Power Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is designed to capture companies whose products and services are driving innovation behind clean power. The fund may invest in equity securities that are not included in the index, cash and cash equivalents or money market instruments, such as repurchase agreements and money market funds. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$62.08

Average Daily Volume

18,595

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ERTH

Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF

ERTH Description

The Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (Fund) is based on the MSCI Global Environment Select Index (Index). The Fund will generally invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index. The Index is comprised of companies that focus on offering products or services that contribute to a more environmentally sustainable economy by making a more efficient use of global resources. The Index is designed to maximize exposure to six Environmental Impact Themes: alternative energy, energy efficiency, green building, sustainable water, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable agriculture. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.42

Average Daily Volume

19,316

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	CNRG	ERTH
30 Days	-4.57%	-0.07%
60 Days	-5.85%	-4.09%
90 Days	-4.69%	0.58%
12 Months	-23.58%	-8.16%

12 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in CNRG	Weight in ERTH	Overlap
AMPS	F	1.36%	0.07%	0.07%
ARRY	F	2.06%	0.45%	0.45%
ENPH	F	2.75%	3.83%	2.75%
FSLR	B	3.29%	4.54%	3.29%
MNTK	F	0.27%	0.05%	0.05%
ORA	C	2.5%	0.95%	0.95%
PLUG	F	1.62%	0.34%	0.34%
RUN	F	1.9%	0.56%	0.56%
SEDG	F	1.91%	0.78%	0.78%
SHLS	F	1.66%	0.37%	0.37%
SPWR	F	1.05%	0.04%	0.04%
TSLA	D	1.94%	3.78%	1.94%

CNRG Overweight 32 Positions Relative to ERTH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CEG	A	4.56%
CMI	B	3.45%
AGR	B	3.07%
GNRC	B	3.07%
NEE	A	3.03%
AMAT	C	2.94%
DQ	F	2.8%
ED	A	2.8%
ADTN	F	2.8%
ACA	C	2.74%
AY	A	2.71%
NJR	A	2.66%
ALE	A	2.64%
AES	A	2.6%
GLW	B	2.34%
VMI	B	2.06%
JKS	D	1.97%
FCEL	F	1.91%
AMRC	D	1.89%
EOSE	F	1.85%
BE	B	1.83%
CSIQ	F	1.81%
EBR	D	1.71%
AMSC	C	1.35%
MAXN	F	1.07%
TAC	B	1.03%
HY	D	0.93%
RNW	D	0.91%
GEV	B	0.84%
NOVA	F	0.83%
ENIC	D	0.66%
NRGV	F	0.31%

CNRG Underweight 29 Positions Relative to ERTH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
DLR	C	-5.45%
LI	D	-3.6%
WMS	C	-2.8%
DAR	F	-1.73%
RIVN	F	-1.49%
MTH	A	-1.42%
NIO	D	-1.39%
BMI	A	-1.36%
KBH	C	-1.29%
VNO	D	-1.13%
WFG	C	-1.1%
XPEV	D	-0.97%
CUZ	A	-0.89%
NEP	B	-0.67%
DEI	A	-0.59%
LCID	F	-0.55%
AAT	A	-0.3%
PGRE	B	-0.21%
REX	B	-0.19%
BZH	F	-0.19%
BDN	A	-0.19%
ERII	F	-0.17%
RENB	F	-0.11%
CHPT	F	-0.11%
TUYA	B	-0.1%
RDUS	F	-0.09%
MERC	A	-0.08%
STEM	F	-0.06%
LEV	F	-0.03%