CGRO vs. PCCE ETF Comparison

Comparison of CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) to Polen Capital China Growth ETF (PCCE)
CGRO

CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF

CGRO Description

CGRO aims to benefit from high-growth sectors in Greater China without compromising American values and interests. The fund includes companies of all sizes located or primarily traded in mainland China, Taiwan, and Chinas special administrative regions, such as Hong Kong. The portfolio construction starts with top-down macro research, which utilizes publicly available data to identify sectors with the highest growth potential. The fund also conducts on-the-ground due diligence wherein it gains insights from 15 investment professionals located in China. Lastly, a fundamental bottom-up approach is used to analyze company-specific data such as financial reports and management expertise. The weight of each sector and company is determined by the sub-advisers assessment of its growth potential, which may change over time. The fund may invest in China A-shares, depositary receipts, and issuers listed on exchanges outside China.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$23.27

Average Daily Volume

739

Number of Holdings *

10

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PCCE

Polen Capital China Growth ETF

PCCE Description PCCE aims to deliver sustainable, above-average earnings growth and long-term stock price appreciation within the Chinese equity market. The strategy is rooted in fundamental research, selecting 25-40 Chinese growth companies with a sustainable edge, such as consistent earnings growth, robust balance sheets, and shareholder-oriented management teams. Such companies are selected within industries characterized by high barriers to entry, such as those requiring substantial capital investment, government approvals, or significant intellectual property. Moreover, it integrates ESG factors into the investment process. While the fund may concentrate investments in the consumer discretionary and financial sectors, it avoids over-concentration in any one industry. Investments are typically held for the long term but are subject to periodic review and potential sale based on changing market conditions, company performance, or perceived threats to competitive advantage.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$11.36

Average Daily Volume

2,747

Number of Holdings *

2

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CGRO PCCE
30 Days -1.56% -2.75%
60 Days 16.55% 14.17%
90 Days 18.80% 21.22%
12 Months 13.83%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CGRO Weight in PCCE Overlap
TCOM B 7.4% 6.42% 6.42%
TME D 2.54% 3.76% 2.54%
Compare ETFs