BLDG vs. ERTH ETF Comparison

Comparison of Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) to Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH)
BLDG

Cambria Global Real Estate ETF

BLDG Description

The investment seeks income and capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, primarily in the securities of domestic and foreign, including developed and emerging market, companies principally engaged in the real estate sector and real-estate related industries (collectively, ?real estate companies?) that exhibit favorable multi-factor metrics, such as value, quality and momentum, according to a quantitative methodology developed by Cambria Investment Management, L.P., the fund?s investment adviser (?Cambria?).

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.17

Average Daily Volume

5,306

Number of Holdings *

43

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
ERTH

Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF

ERTH Description The Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (Fund) is based on the MSCI Global Environment Select Index (Index). The Fund will generally invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index. The Index is comprised of companies that focus on offering products or services that contribute to a more environmentally sustainable economy by making a more efficient use of global resources. The Index is designed to maximize exposure to six Environmental Impact Themes: alternative energy, energy efficiency, green building, sustainable water, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable agriculture. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$45.27

Average Daily Volume

17,219

Number of Holdings *

40

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period BLDG ERTH
30 Days 3.50% 7.83%
60 Days 7.15% 8.19%
90 Days 14.73% 14.73%
12 Months 19.26% 3.52%
5 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in BLDG Weight in ERTH Overlap
BDN C 1.43% 0.21% 0.21%
CUZ C 1.45% 1.02% 1.02%
DEI B 1.56% 0.67% 0.67%
PGRE D 1.38% 0.21% 0.21%
VNO B 1.81% 1.4% 1.4%
BLDG Overweight 38 Positions Relative to ERTH
Symbol Grade Weight
PDM C 1.85%
AKR B 1.65%
BXP C 1.6%
WELL C 1.6%
SBRA C 1.59%
IIPR B 1.58%
HIW C 1.56%
OHI C 1.52%
CTRE C 1.49%
BNL B 1.46%
BRX C 1.45%
AVB C 1.45%
EQR C 1.44%
ROIC C 1.42%
REG C 1.39%
IVT D 1.37%
ESRT C 1.36%
KRC C 1.33%
EPR C 1.32%
WSR D 1.27%
AMH D 1.26%
EQC D 1.25%
EGP C 1.23%
STAG D 1.22%
BFS B 1.22%
SKT B 1.21%
REXR C 1.12%
SHO C 1.06%
DRH C 1.06%
APLE C 1.02%
HST D 1.01%
HPP F 0.99%
CLDT D 0.99%
PEB D 0.98%
PK D 0.98%
RLJ D 0.91%
FSP D 0.87%
NXDT D 0.0%
BLDG Underweight 35 Positions Relative to ERTH
Symbol Grade Weight
TSLA C -5.22%
FSLR C -5.17%
DLR B -4.93%
NVDA C -4.38%
ENPH D -3.52%
LI D -2.9%
WMS D -2.41%
RIVN F -2.14%
MTH C -1.72%
NIO C -1.68%
KBH C -1.49%
BMI B -1.47%
DAR F -1.31%
XPEV C -1.23%
WFG B -1.17%
ORA B -0.93%
RUN D -0.93%
LCID C -0.73%
NEP C -0.56%
PLUG F -0.35%
AAT C -0.32%
SEDG F -0.27%
SHLS F -0.23%
BZH B -0.22%
ARRY F -0.22%
ERII C -0.21%
REX D -0.16%
JKS C -0.15%
CHPT F -0.12%
RDUS D -0.1%
TUYA C -0.07%
RENB F -0.06%
MNTK D -0.06%
MERC D -0.05%
AMPS F -0.05%
Compare ETFs