LGHT vs. TMFM ETF Comparison
Comparison of Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) to Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF (TMFM)
LGHT
Langar Global HealthTech ETF
LGHT Description
LGHT targets the global healthcare technology industry. The fund actively invests in HealthTech companies, which the adviser defines as firms that develop technology designed to create healthcare efficiency by addressing key pain points for patients, providers, payors, and hospitals, including those companies that derive a majority of their revenue from HealthTech products and services. The portfolio construction starts by identifying companies that fit into the advisers HealthTech definition. The remaining companies are screened using a proprietary metric that assesses each firms financial health, involvement in relevant controversies, as well as the strength of its team and culture. Each company is then assigned an industry risk score through an algorithm that defines quantitative and qualitative risk categories and weights them accordingly. Finally, each company is reviewed by an investment committee. However, the portfolio manager still has full discretion over the final selection.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$10.31
Average Daily Volume
913
31
TMFM
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF
TMFM Description
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF is an exchange traded fund launched by The RBB Fund, Inc. It is managed by Motley Fool Asset Management, LLC. It invests in public equity markets of the United States. It invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth stocks of mid-cap companies, within the market capitalization range of the Russell Midcap Growth Total Return Index. The fund employs fundamental analysis to create its portfolio. The fund seeks to benchmark the performance of its portfolio against the Russell Midcap Growth Total Return Index. Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF was formed on November 1, 2010 and is domiciled in the United States.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$32.27
Average Daily Volume
6,114
29
Performance
Period | LGHT | TMFM |
---|---|---|
30 Days | -3.06% | 5.86% |
60 Days | -2.46% | 10.31% |
90 Days | -0.81% | 14.02% |
12 Months | 36.41% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in LGHT | Weight in TMFM | Overlap | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
DXCM | C | 5.51% | 2.76% | 2.76% |
LGHT Overweight 30 Positions Relative to TMFM
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
ISRG | A | 15.39% | |
GEHC | C | 8.56% | |
RMD | C | 6.71% | |
IQV | F | 6.34% | |
PODD | B | 5.26% | |
VEEV | C | 5.15% | |
PHG | C | 4.87% | |
ZBH | C | 3.57% | |
BNTX | D | 3.53% | |
ALGN | D | 2.85% | |
MASI | B | 2.46% | |
DOCS | C | 2.06% | |
MRNA | F | 1.72% | |
PRCT | B | 1.27% | |
ALKS | C | 0.66% | |
TNDM | D | 0.54% | |
IRTC | C | 0.44% | |
PRVA | C | 0.44% | |
OMCL | C | 0.42% | |
LFST | C | 0.31% | |
TDOC | C | 0.28% | |
PGNY | F | 0.25% | |
EVH | F | 0.22% | |
SDGR | C | 0.21% | |
GDRX | F | 0.2% | |
ALHC | C | 0.2% | |
PHR | F | 0.17% | |
ACCD | F | 0.07% | |
MODV | C | 0.03% | |
TBRG | A | 0.03% |
LGHT Underweight 28 Positions Relative to TMFM
Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
---|---|---|---|
BRO | B | -5.99% | |
TYL | B | -5.46% | |
AXON | A | -4.97% | |
TOST | A | -4.91% | |
BR | B | -4.61% | |
SNEX | A | -4.24% | |
GMED | A | -4.01% | |
HQY | A | -3.84% | |
FAST | B | -3.78% | |
SBAC | D | -3.35% | |
RXO | C | -3.34% | |
HRI | C | -3.18% | |
GSHD | A | -3.05% | |
WSO | A | -3.01% | |
GNTX | F | -2.99% | |
GWRE | A | -2.96% | |
GXO | B | -2.91% | |
WAT | B | -2.82% | |
ALRM | C | -2.73% | |
EMN | D | -2.31% | |
MORN | B | -2.3% | |
TREX | C | -2.29% | |
TRU | D | -2.22% | |
CSGP | C | -2.06% | |
BMRN | F | -1.9% | |
RARE | F | -1.85% | |
TSCO | D | -1.81% | |
ARE | F | -1.53% |
LGHT: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
TMFM: Top Represented Industries & Keywords