LGHT vs. ETEC ETF Comparison
Comparison of Langar Global HealthTech ETF (LGHT) to iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF (ETEC)
LGHT
Langar Global HealthTech ETF
LGHT Description
LGHT targets the global healthcare technology industry. The fund actively invests in HealthTech companies, which the adviser defines as firms that develop technology designed to create healthcare efficiency by addressing key pain points for patients, providers, payors, and hospitals, including those companies that derive a majority of their revenue from HealthTech products and services. The portfolio construction starts by identifying companies that fit into the advisers HealthTech definition. The remaining companies are screened using a proprietary metric that assesses each firms financial health, involvement in relevant controversies, as well as the strength of its team and culture. Each company is then assigned an industry risk score through an algorithm that defines quantitative and qualitative risk categories and weights them accordingly. Finally, each company is reviewed by an investment committee. However, the portfolio manager still has full discretion over the final selection.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$10.35
Average Daily Volume
915
31
ETEC
iShares Breakthrough Environmental Solutions ETF
ETEC Description
ETEC provides exposure to global equities categorized as emerging green technology. Selection begins with the initial index universe that then excludes companies involved in controversial issues against UNGC principles. Stocks are reviewed to meet revenue derived from eight sustainable themes: energy efficiency, green buildings and transportation, pollution prevention and reduction, renewable energy, resource efficiency technologies and services, water, and sustainable agriculture, food, and forestry. The fund excludes companies with total sustainable product revenue less than 25%. The remaining stocks are screened further to only include companies classified as green technologies. Stocks are scored within the Rogers innovation adoption curve to determine their position across the innovators-laggards spectrum, which contributes to an aggregate score. The top 50 companies with the highest aggregate scores are selected. The market cap-weighted index is reconstituted annually in December and rebalanced quarterly.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$19.76
Average Daily Volume
519
11
Performance
| Period | LGHT | ETEC |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | -1.96% | -3.35% |
| 60 Days | -2.17% | -6.11% |
| 90 Days | -1.81% | -3.59% |
| 12 Months | -7.07% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in LGHT | Weight in ETEC | Overlap |
|---|
LGHT Overweight 31 Positions Relative to ETEC
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ISRG | A | 15.39% | |
| GEHC | D | 8.56% | |
| RMD | C | 6.71% | |
| IQV | F | 6.34% | |
| DXCM | C | 5.51% | |
| PODD | C | 5.26% | |
| VEEV | C | 5.15% | |
| PHG | C | 4.87% | |
| ZBH | C | 3.57% | |
| BNTX | C | 3.53% | |
| ALGN | D | 2.85% | |
| MASI | B | 2.46% | |
| DOCS | C | 2.06% | |
| MRNA | F | 1.72% | |
| PRCT | B | 1.27% | |
| ALKS | C | 0.66% | |
| TNDM | D | 0.54% | |
| IRTC | C | 0.44% | |
| PRVA | C | 0.44% | |
| OMCL | C | 0.42% | |
| LFST | B | 0.31% | |
| TDOC | C | 0.28% | |
| PGNY | F | 0.25% | |
| EVH | F | 0.22% | |
| SDGR | C | 0.21% | |
| GDRX | F | 0.2% | |
| ALHC | C | 0.2% | |
| PHR | F | 0.17% | |
| ACCD | D | 0.07% | |
| MODV | C | 0.03% | |
| TBRG | B | 0.03% |
LGHT: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
ETEC: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
