GPOW vs. JHMU ETF Comparison

Comparison of Goldman Sachs North American Pipelines & Power Equity ETF (GPOW) to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU)
GPOW

Goldman Sachs North American Pipelines & Power Equity ETF

GPOW Description

The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in securities included in its underlying index. The index is designed to deliver exposure to equity securities of U.S. and Canadian listed companies, including companies structured as master limited partnerships, operating in the pipelines and power universe. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$44.55

Average Daily Volume

624

Number of Holdings *

7

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
JHMU

John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF

JHMU Description The fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities that compose the fund's index. The index is designed to comprise securities in the utilities sector within the U.S. Universe whose market capitalizations are larger than that of the 1001st largest U.S. company at the time of reconstitution. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.81

Average Daily Volume

1,188

Number of Holdings *

10

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period GPOW JHMU
30 Days -0.41% 0.15%
60 Days 6.19% 0.07%
90 Days 8.03% 0.49%
12 Months
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in GPOW Weight in JHMU Overlap
Compare ETFs