CANE vs. RSPC ETF Comparison

Comparison of Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV (CANE) to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF (RSPC)
CANE

Teucrium Sugar Fund ETV

CANE Description

The investment seeks to replicate, net of expenses, the performance of ICE Sugar Futures Contracts. The fund seeks to have the daily changes in percentage terms of the shares' net asset value (NAV) reflect the daily changes in percentage terms of a weighted average of the closing settlement prices for three futures contracts for sugar that are traded on ICE Futures US, specifically: (1) the second-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 35%, (2) the third-to-expire Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract, weighted 30%, and (3) the Sugar No. 11 Futures Contract expiring in the March following the expiration month of the third-to-expire contract, weighted 35%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$11.88

Average Daily Volume

24,107

Number of Holdings *

2

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
RSPC

Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF

RSPC Description The fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the underlying index. The underlying index is composed of all of the components of the S&P 500® Communication Services Index, an index that contains the common stocks of all companies included in the S&P 500® Index that are classified as members of the communication services sector, as defined according to the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.52

Average Daily Volume

17,713

Number of Holdings *

10

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period CANE RSPC
30 Days -11.74% -3.34%
60 Days -7.19% -1.84%
90 Days -14.39% -4.46%
12 Months -10.41% 8.38%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in CANE Weight in RSPC Overlap
T B 10.96% 4.5% 4.5%
Compare ETFs