BUFP vs. JHMU ETF Comparison

Comparison of PGIM Laddered Fund of Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU)
BUFP

PGIM Laddered Fund of Buffer 12 ETF

BUFP Description

The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by providing investors with U.S. large-cap equity market exposure while attempting to limit downside risk through a "laddered portfolio" of twelve PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETFs. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in ETFs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.75

Average Daily Volume

5,338

Number of Holdings *

10

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
JHMU

John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF

JHMU Description The fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities that compose the fund's index. The index is designed to comprise securities in the utilities sector within the U.S. Universe whose market capitalizations are larger than that of the 1001st largest U.S. company at the time of reconstitution. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.58

Average Daily Volume

3,463

Number of Holdings *

10

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period BUFP JHMU
30 Days 1.50% 0.87%
60 Days 2.56% -0.33%
90 Days 3.77% 0.19%
12 Months 8.04%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in BUFP Weight in JHMU Overlap
BUFP Overweight 10 Positions Relative to JHMU
Symbol Grade Weight
NOVP B 8.38%
APRP A 8.36%
MRCP A 8.35%
JUNP B 8.34%
MAYP A 8.31%
AUGP A 8.3%
JULP A 8.3%
DECP B 8.27%
JANP A 8.27%
FEBP A 8.25%
BUFP Underweight 10 Positions Relative to JHMU
Symbol Grade Weight
AEP D -6.02%
DUK C -5.11%
XEL A -4.99%
SRE A -4.92%
SO D -4.69%
EXC C -4.12%
ED D -4.12%
EIX B -4.09%
PEG A -3.94%
DTE C -3.83%
Compare ETFs