BUFP vs. JHMU ETF Comparison
Comparison of PGIM Laddered Fund of Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP) to John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF (JHMU)
BUFP
PGIM Laddered Fund of Buffer 12 ETF
BUFP Description
The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by providing investors with U.S. large-cap equity market exposure while attempting to limit downside risk through a "laddered portfolio" of twelve PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETFs. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in ETFs.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.75
Average Daily Volume
5,338
Number of Holdings
*
10
* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
JHMU
John Hancock Dynamic Municipal Bond ETF
JHMU Description
The fund normally invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities that compose the fund's index. The index is designed to comprise securities in the utilities sector within the U.S. Universe whose market capitalizations are larger than that of the 1001st largest U.S. company at the time of reconstitution. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.58
Average Daily Volume
3,463
Number of Holdings
*
10
* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period | BUFP | JHMU |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 1.50% | 0.87% |
60 Days | 2.56% | -0.33% |
90 Days | 3.77% | 0.19% |
12 Months | 8.04% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in BUFP | Weight in JHMU | Overlap |
---|
BUFP: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
JHMU: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Industries:
Utilities - Regulated Electric
Utilities - Diversified
Keywords:
S&P 500
Electricity
Natural Gas
Distribution Services
Electric Power
Electric Utility
Energy Source
Energy Sources
Nasdaq 100
Sempra Energy
Biomass
Electric Services
Energy Related Products
Gas Pipeline
Gas Transmission
Natural Gas Distribution
Natural Gas Pipeline
Natural Gas Storage
Natural Gas Transmission
Renewable Energy Sources