BLDG vs. RWR ETF Comparison

Comparison of Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) to SPDR DJ Wilshire REIT ETF (RWR)

BLDG

Cambria Global Real Estate ETF

BLDG Description

The investment seeks income and capital appreciation. The fund is actively managed and seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, primarily in the securities of domestic and foreign, including developed and emerging market, companies principally engaged in the real estate sector and real-estate related industries (collectively, ?real estate companies?) that exhibit favorable multi-factor metrics, such as value, quality and momentum, according to a quantitative methodology developed by Cambria Investment Management, L.P., the fund?s investment adviser (?Cambria?).

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.50

Average Daily Volume

4,168

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RWR

SPDR DJ Wilshire REIT ETF

RWR Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index. In seeking to track the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Select REIT Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is designed to provide a measure of real estate securities that serve as proxies for direct real estate investing, in part by excluding securities whose value is not always closely tied to the value of the underlying real estate. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$105.56

Average Daily Volume

328,265

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	BLDG	RWR
30 Days	-0.70%	0.48%
60 Days	-2.54%	-0.61%
90 Days	0.86%	2.23%
12 Months	13.94%	27.65%

32 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in BLDG	Weight in RWR	Overlap
AAT	B	1.41%	0.13%	0.13%
AKR	B	1.41%	0.25%	0.25%
AVB	B	1.36%	3.18%	1.36%
BDN	C	1.24%	0.09%	0.09%
BNL	D	1.2%	0.31%	0.31%
BXP	C	1.34%	1.13%	1.13%
CSR	B	1.37%	0.11%	0.11%
CTRE	C	1.3%	0.49%	0.49%
CUZ	B	1.38%	0.46%	0.46%
DEI	B	1.39%	0.3%	0.3%
EPRT	B	1.34%	0.56%	0.56%
ESRT	C	1.36%	0.14%	0.14%
FCPT	C	1.28%	0.25%	0.25%
HIW	C	1.27%	0.33%	0.33%
HPP	F	1.21%	0.06%	0.06%
IIPR	D	1.06%	0.29%	0.29%
JBGS	F	1.2%	0.13%	0.13%
KRC	B	1.53%	0.41%	0.41%
LXP	D	1.29%	0.27%	0.27%
MAC	B	1.47%	0.41%	0.41%
NHI	D	1.26%	0.33%	0.33%
NNN	C	1.12%	0.75%	0.75%
OHI	C	1.29%	1.01%	1.01%
PDM	D	1.32%	0.12%	0.12%
PGRE	F	1.42%	0.09%	0.09%
PK	C	1.45%	0.3%	0.3%
ROIC	A	1.49%	0.22%	0.22%
SLG	B	1.49%	0.48%	0.48%
STAG	D	1.28%	0.65%	0.65%
TRNO	F	1.25%	0.58%	0.58%
WELL	A	1.35%	4.6%	1.35%
WPC	C	1.19%	1.18%	1.18%

BLDG Overweight 12 Positions Relative to RWR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FSP	B	1.61%
WSR	A	1.44%
GOOD	B	1.43%
OLP	B	1.42%
LTC	B	1.39%
SBRA	C	1.38%
CTO	B	1.36%
IVT	A	1.34%
PINE	C	1.3%
ALX	D	1.29%
CIO	C	1.19%
OPI	F	0.87%

BLDG Underweight 66 Positions Relative to RWR

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PLD	F	-9.67%
EQIX	A	-7.79%
SPG	A	-4.66%
PSA	C	-4.4%
DLR	B	-4.39%
O	C	-4.08%
EXR	C	-3.4%
VTR	B	-2.58%
EQR	C	-2.45%
ESS	B	-1.91%
INVH	D	-1.88%
MAA	B	-1.81%
ARE	F	-1.66%
KIM	A	-1.64%
DOC	C	-1.47%
SUI	C	-1.43%
UDR	B	-1.31%
ELS	C	-1.31%
CPT	B	-1.26%
HST	C	-1.2%
REG	A	-1.18%
AMH	C	-1.16%
CUBE	C	-1.06%
REXR	F	-0.9%
BRX	A	-0.85%
FRT	B	-0.84%
EGP	D	-0.82%
ADC	A	-0.75%
VNO	C	-0.68%
FR	D	-0.68%
RHP	B	-0.66%
KRG	B	-0.58%
COLD	D	-0.56%
PECO	A	-0.47%
IRT	A	-0.46%
SKT	A	-0.38%
APLE	B	-0.34%
EPR	C	-0.33%
CDP	C	-0.33%
NSA	C	-0.29%
UE	B	-0.27%
MPW	F	-0.25%
EQC	B	-0.21%
SHO	D	-0.2%
DRH	B	-0.18%
VRE	B	-0.15%
PEB	D	-0.15%
RLJ	C	-0.15%
XHR	B	-0.15%
GTY	A	-0.15%
ALEX	B	-0.14%
GNL	F	-0.14%
ELME	D	-0.14%
UMH	B	-0.13%
NTST	C	-0.12%
DEA	D	-0.12%
AIV	C	-0.11%
NXRT	B	-0.1%
INN	D	-0.07%
PLYM	F	-0.07%
SVC	F	-0.05%
CHCT	C	-0.05%
UHT	D	-0.05%
GMRE	F	-0.05%
DHC	F	-0.05%
CLDT	B	-0.04%