BAMU vs. BUFP ETF Comparison

Comparison of Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF (BAMU) to PGIM Laddered Fund of Buffer 12 ETF (BUFP)
BAMU

Brookstone Ultra-Short Bond ETF

BAMU Description

The fund is an actively managed exchange traded fund ("ETF") that, under normal circumstances, invests at least 80% of its net assets in U.S. Treasuries and investment grade corporate bonds with a 0-2 year maturity range, including unaffiliated ETFs purchased in the secondary market that invest substantially all of their assets in such fixed income instruments.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.47

Average Daily Volume

7,640

Number of Holdings *

4

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
BUFP

PGIM Laddered Fund of Buffer 12 ETF

BUFP Description The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by providing investors with U.S. large-cap equity market exposure while attempting to limit downside risk through a "laddered portfolio" of twelve PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETFs. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in ETFs.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$26.82

Average Daily Volume

5,458

Number of Holdings *

10

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period BAMU BUFP
30 Days 0.35% 1.85%
60 Days 0.61% 2.56%
90 Days 0.96% 4.05%
12 Months 4.28%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in BAMU Weight in BUFP Overlap
BAMU Overweight 4 Positions Relative to BUFP
Symbol Grade Weight
IBTE B 19.49%
BIL A 19.42%
SGOV B 19.41%
BILS A 19.4%
BAMU Underweight 10 Positions Relative to BUFP
Symbol Grade Weight
NOVP B -8.38%
APRP A -8.36%
MRCP A -8.35%
JUNP B -8.34%
MAYP A -8.31%
AUGP A -8.3%
JULP A -8.3%
DECP B -8.27%
JANP A -8.27%
FEBP A -8.25%
Compare ETFs