IPDP vs. RFV ETF Comparison

Comparison of Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF (RFV)

IPDP

Dividend Performers ETF

IPDP Description

The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$18.50

Average Daily Volume

1,649

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

RFV

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value ETF

RFV Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong value characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$117.32

Average Daily Volume

12,866

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IPDP	RFV
30 Days	7.13%	7.18%
60 Days	2.50%	4.34%
90 Days	7.50%	5.64%
12 Months	28.83%	25.41%

1 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in IPDP	Weight in RFV	Overlap
	RGA	A	2.25%	1.19%	1.19%

IPDP Overweight 48 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ETN	A	2.51%
TT	B	2.49%
APOG	B	2.48%
QCOM	B	2.47%
APH	A	2.46%
AVGO	A	2.41%
DOV	B	2.32%
KLAC	A	2.28%
HIG	B	2.28%
A	A	2.24%
TRV	D	2.19%
ITT	A	2.18%
DCI	B	2.16%
CTAS	B	2.16%
MCK	B	2.13%
AIT	B	2.09%
GWW	D	2.06%
SHW	D	2.03%
ELV	B	2.01%
SEIC	D	2.01%
GPC	C	1.98%
AOS	C	1.97%
MSI	A	1.95%
BRC	B	1.95%
FAST	D	1.92%
ABM	C	1.92%
HD	D	1.92%
SYK	D	1.92%
CSX	D	1.91%
WTS	B	1.9%
HI	D	1.88%
ADP	C	1.86%
PAYX	B	1.85%
MMC	B	1.79%
ABT	F	1.79%
UPS	D	1.77%
JNJ	D	1.76%
SNA	D	1.76%
CSCO	D	1.75%
AAPL	B	1.7%
ROK	F	1.7%
CHE	F	1.68%
UNH	C	1.64%
CAH	F	1.64%
NSP	D	1.63%
ACN	F	1.62%
GL	F	1.25%
HUM	D	1.15%

IPDP Underweight 87 Positions Relative to RFV

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PBF	D	-2.91%
M	D	-2.69%
AVT	B	-2.67%
SNX	A	-2.67%
ARW	C	-2.21%
DINO	D	-2.12%
X	D	-2.08%
MTZ	C	-2.07%
GT	C	-2.07%
LAD	F	-1.98%
JWN	C	-1.88%
AN	C	-1.87%
JLL	A	-1.84%
THC	A	-1.81%
MAN	C	-1.78%
AA	B	-1.78%
USFD	B	-1.77%
ADNT	F	-1.65%
PFGC	C	-1.65%
GHC	B	-1.59%
WCC	B	-1.57%
TMHC	B	-1.53%
UNM	B	-1.52%
PPC	B	-1.51%
CLF	F	-1.46%
ALLY	B	-1.42%
HTZ	F	-1.41%
KD	A	-1.41%
R	A	-1.34%
ARMK	B	-1.32%
MDU	B	-1.3%
LEA	F	-1.25%
ASB	B	-1.2%
KMPR	C	-1.18%
PVH	D	-1.18%
PAG	C	-1.16%
CMC	B	-1.15%
JEF	A	-1.12%
CUZ	B	-0.98%
FNB	B	-0.97%
THO	F	-0.97%
FYBR	B	-0.97%
PRGO	D	-0.96%
WHR	F	-0.95%
ZION	B	-0.91%
KRC	D	-0.9%
FLR	D	-0.88%
VAC	D	-0.88%
HOG	D	-0.87%
POST	C	-0.83%
FHN	B	-0.83%
AR	B	-0.82%
UGI	C	-0.78%
VLY	D	-0.77%
CHK	B	-0.76%
ONB	B	-0.73%
ENOV	F	-0.73%
TGNA	C	-0.71%
JHG	A	-0.7%
GPS	D	-0.68%
COHR	D	-0.68%
SWX	B	-0.67%
PB	C	-0.66%
GEF	F	-0.66%
PENN	F	-0.66%
TCBI	C	-0.65%
IRT	B	-0.64%
OSK	C	-0.62%
BJ	B	-0.6%
CNO	B	-0.56%
AGCO	D	-0.56%
ORI	B	-0.55%
BKH	C	-0.55%
WBS	D	-0.54%
VSH	C	-0.54%
NVST	F	-0.52%
NOV	F	-0.5%
WERN	D	-0.49%
FAF	D	-0.47%
SR	C	-0.46%
BERY	D	-0.45%
NYCB	D	-0.44%
KNX	F	-0.44%
CNXC	D	-0.38%
UA	F	-0.32%
UAA	F	-0.31%
LEG	F	-0.23%