NBSM vs. OUSM ETF Comparison

Comparison of Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF (NBSM) to O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM)
NBSM

Neuberger Berman Small-Mid Cap ETF

NBSM Description

NBSM focuses on capital growth primarily through investments in small- and mid-cap firms. The fund seeks out undervalued companies with strong market positions and financial health, mainly in domestic markets with a minor proportion in foreign securities. Utilizing a bottom-up analysis, the fund manager identifies organizations they believe are valued below their intrinsic worth. Key considerations include historical returns, market niche, barriers to entry, and self-financing capabilities, emphasizing companies with established business operations over speculative growth prospects. NBSM aims to capitalize on market inefficiencies and manage risks through diversification and fundamental analysis. Furthermore, the manager also takes into account ESG factors into their decision making whenever applicable, aiming for a more comprehensive evaluation of potential investments. The fund may sell a security if it underperforms, reaches a set price or when better investment opportunities arise.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$25.81

Average Daily Volume

23,309

Number of Holdings *

10

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
OUSM

O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

OUSM Description O'Shares FTSE US Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF is an exchange traded fund (ETF) that seeks investment performance that correlates generally to price and yield before fees and expenses of the FTSE USA Small Cap Qual/Vol/Yield Factor 3% Capped Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.21

Average Daily Volume

62,721

Number of Holdings *

105

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period NBSM OUSM
30 Days 4.88% 6.80%
60 Days 3.23%
90 Days 5.43%
12 Months 22.31%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in NBSM Weight in OUSM Overlap
ITT A 2.96% 1.85% 1.85%
NBSM Overweight 9 Positions Relative to OUSM
Symbol Grade Weight
EXP D 4.1%
KEX A 3.6%
TDW C 3.29%
WSO B 2.95%
FICO A 2.93%
LSCC F 2.92%
TSCO A 2.85%
TTEK A 2.76%
ATR C 2.68%
NBSM Underweight 104 Positions Relative to OUSM
Symbol Grade Weight
WSM C -3.67%
TW B -2.23%
LECO D -2.16%
EHC C -2.13%
OC C -2.12%
DKS D -2.1%
TXRH B -2.08%
JNPR D -2.06%
CHE F -1.94%
OGN B -1.88%
ORI A -1.84%
TFX D -1.76%
AOS D -1.76%
NYT B -1.75%
PRI D -1.72%
TPR D -1.67%
CASY B -1.63%
SEIC D -1.63%
BWA C -1.62%
LFUS C -1.58%
HLI C -1.56%
TTC D -1.56%
MKTX D -1.54%
GNTX D -1.54%
MUSA B -1.5%
DCI C -1.5%
EVR A -1.46%
HRB B -1.45%
BMI B -1.4%
RLI A -1.29%
PINC F -1.29%
DLB C -1.28%
MTG C -1.27%
AVT B -1.27%
VST B -1.26%
ESNT C -1.24%
RHI F -1.23%
SSD F -1.19%
AIT B -1.19%
RL D -1.17%
PDCO F -1.16%
UFPI C -1.16%
WU D -1.1%
POWI C -1.09%
MLI C -1.08%
LSTR C -1.08%
RDN C -1.07%
WH F -1.05%
BC F -1.02%
INGR B -0.99%
WTS B -0.95%
PII F -0.86%
HLNE C -0.81%
AAON D -0.78%
EXPO C -0.77%
VSH C -0.75%
TGNA C -0.72%
MSM F -0.71%
IDCC C -0.67%
CHH F -0.65%
FLO C -0.65%
APAM B -0.64%
CCOI F -0.6%
FHI D -0.57%
COLM B -0.54%
SHOO C -0.54%
LANC D -0.48%
NI B -0.47%
CRI F -0.47%
BRC C -0.44%
WDFC D -0.41%
WTRG C -0.4%
CNS C -0.39%
PNW B -0.34%
GOLF C -0.34%
JJSF C -0.31%
CALM D -0.31%
OGE A -0.28%
LZB C -0.27%
EIG D -0.23%
NFG B -0.2%
SNDR D -0.2%
REYN B -0.2%
KFRC F -0.19%
IDA C -0.19%
AMSF F -0.18%
POR C -0.17%
UVV C -0.16%
NJR C -0.16%
ALE B -0.14%
WMK B -0.14%
BKH C -0.14%
OTTR C -0.14%
RGR F -0.13%
OGS C -0.13%
NWE C -0.12%
SR C -0.12%
AVA C -0.11%
AWR C -0.11%
MGEE B -0.11%
DHIL D -0.09%
EBF C -0.08%
CPK C -0.07%
NWN C -0.05%
Compare ETFs