XLC vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
XLC

The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund

XLC Description

The investment seeks to correspond generally to the price and yield performance of publicly traded equity securities of companies in the Communication Services Select Sector Index. Normally, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index includes companies that have been identified as Communication Services companies by the GICS®, including securities of companies from the following industries: diversified telecommunication services; wireless telecommunication services; media; entertainment; and interactive media & services. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$80.79

Average Daily Volume

5,987,395

Number of Holdings *

22

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$24.58

Average Daily Volume

65,487

Number of Holdings *

52

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period XLC PGJ
30 Days -1.26% -0.53%
60 Days 1.62% -1.25%
90 Days 6.32% 5.67%
12 Months 41.49% -5.01%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in XLC Weight in PGJ Overlap
XLC Overweight 22 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
META B 23.55%
GOOGL A 13.17%
GOOG A 11.13%
NFLX D 4.61%
TMUS B 4.55%
EA D 4.41%
VZ D 4.41%
DIS B 4.3%
T C 4.23%
CMCSA D 4.17%
CHTR F 3.72%
TTWO F 3.31%
WBD D 2.67%
OMC A 2.67%
LYV D 1.9%
IPG D 1.69%
NWSA C 1.34%
MTCH F 1.28%
FOXA A 1.06%
PARA D 0.76%
FOX A 0.54%
NWS C 0.42%
XLC Underweight 52 Positions Relative to PGJ
Symbol Grade Weight
TCOM A -8.32%
BABA D -8.14%
YUMC D -7.24%
BIDU F -7.18%
NTES F -6.03%
JD B -4.8%
TME A -4.57%
ZTO B -4.23%
BEKE C -4.2%
HTHT A -3.73%
VIPS F -3.57%
BZ A -3.4%
NIO F -3.12%
YMM A -3.04%
TAL C -2.84%
LI F -2.7%
QFIN A -1.66%
IQ A -1.34%
DQ F -1.07%
ATHM F -1.06%
XPEV F -1.0%
MNSO A -0.94%
HOLI D -0.92%
BILI B -0.83%
RLX C -0.74%
ATAT D -0.64%
CSIQ F -0.62%
FINV C -0.58%
GOTU B -0.57%
MOMO D -0.56%
JKS F -0.56%
WB D -0.45%
ZLAB F -0.43%
EH B -0.42%
GDS F -0.35%
QD B -0.28%
TIGR D -0.27%
HUYA B -0.27%
NOAH B -0.27%
SOHU A -0.23%
CAN F -0.16%
LX D -0.15%
KC F -0.14%
VNET F -0.14%
TUYA D -0.13%
DADA F -0.13%
ZH F -0.12%
DDL F -0.11%
API D -0.11%
KNDI D -0.1%
DAO F -0.09%
IMAB C -0.07%
Compare ETFs