XHS vs. SIXS ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS)
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$94.83

Average Daily Volume

5,701

Number of Holdings *

58

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
SIXS

6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF

SIXS Description The investment seeks to provide capital appreciation. Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets (plus the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in small-capitalization equity securities. The Sub-Adviser considers small-capitalization companies to be the smallest 75% of stocks included in the Russell 3000 Index by market capitalization. Although it invests primarily in small-capitalization securities, the fund may invest in equity securities of companies of any capitalization. The equity securities in which it invests are mainly common stocks.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$47.22

Average Daily Volume

3,023

Number of Holdings *

80

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period XHS SIXS
30 Days 3.67% 1.53%
60 Days 8.64% 1.71%
90 Days 6.68% 0.30%
12 Months 11.12% 14.79%
4 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in XHS Weight in SIXS Overlap
CCRN F 1.46% 1.15% 1.15%
CRVL B 1.78% 1.22% 1.22%
ENSG B 1.94% 1.09% 1.09%
NHC D 1.8% 1.08% 1.08%
XHS Overweight 54 Positions Relative to SIXS
Symbol Grade Weight
HIMS C 2.27%
AMN F 2.12%
MOH C 2.06%
CVS B 2.02%
PGNY D 2.02%
THC B 2.02%
UNH F 2.0%
CI B 2.0%
UHS B 1.99%
SEM C 1.99%
PINC D 1.98%
ELV B 1.98%
HUM F 1.98%
OMI B 1.97%
HCA A 1.96%
EHC B 1.96%
DGX C 1.96%
MCK B 1.96%
HQY B 1.96%
RDNT B 1.96%
CHE B 1.95%
PDCO F 1.95%
DVA B 1.95%
OPCH C 1.94%
AMED F 1.92%
HSIC D 1.92%
NEO D 1.91%
CNC B 1.91%
CAH B 1.89%
LH D 1.88%
SGRY F 1.85%
RCM D 1.83%
BKD B 1.79%
ACHC D 1.79%
AGL F 1.78%
GH D 1.72%
CYH D 1.7%
PRVA F 1.69%
ADUS C 1.53%
ACCD F 1.43%
AHCO C 1.42%
USPH C 1.38%
MD D 1.36%
LFST F 1.12%
ASTH C 1.06%
OPK D 0.98%
DCGO D 0.96%
PETQ D 0.94%
CSTL D 0.9%
FLGT F 0.85%
MODV F 0.76%
ALHC F 0.76%
NRC D 0.56%
PNTG B 0.42%
XHS Underweight 76 Positions Relative to SIXS
Symbol Grade Weight
COLL C -2.45%
CALM C -2.33%
PRDO D -2.28%
INVA D -2.24%
EIG B -2.19%
HCI C -1.36%
VRRM B -1.27%
GRBK B -1.26%
SM A -1.24%
WRLD C -1.24%
GDEN D -1.23%
CLW B -1.22%
RGR D -1.21%
NPK A -1.21%
CVI C -1.21%
HP C -1.2%
SLCA C -1.19%
ATGE D -1.18%
ZEUS B -1.18%
CORT D -1.18%
VRTS C -1.17%
ANDE B -1.17%
PRG C -1.16%
DNOW B -1.16%
JBSS C -1.16%
WNC A -1.16%
UVV D -1.15%
LQDT C -1.15%
PARR D -1.15%
MHO B -1.15%
MLI B -1.15%
CTRE A -1.15%
HRMY C -1.15%
LRN C -1.14%
BRC D -1.14%
ATEN C -1.13%
PMT C -1.13%
OGN C -1.13%
RES C -1.13%
SAFT D -1.13%
AEL A -1.12%
PBH C -1.12%
HCC D -1.12%
AX D -1.12%
CRC C -1.11%
PRGS F -1.11%
SPNT B -1.11%
TR C -1.11%
JJSF F -1.11%
AVA C -1.11%
PLAB D -1.1%
HAFC D -1.1%
PFBC B -1.1%
SMPL F -1.1%
AMBC D -1.1%
GTY D -1.1%
NSIT D -1.09%
WABC C -1.09%
SCSC B -1.09%
HSTM D -1.09%
MMSI D -1.08%
SPTN F -1.08%
TWI F -1.08%
MCS D -1.08%
WOR C -1.07%
ENVA B -1.07%
MOV D -1.07%
WDFC D -1.07%
PCRX F -1.07%
BKE D -1.06%
NWN D -1.06%
AMSF D -1.04%
FIZZ F -1.0%
ALKS F -1.0%
OSUR F -0.96%
CCOI F -0.95%
Compare ETFs