XHS vs. RFG ETF Comparison

Comparison of SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG)
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$86.17

Average Daily Volume

5,388

Number of Holdings *

58

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$46.85

Average Daily Volume

42,191

Number of Holdings *

80

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period XHS RFG
30 Days -6.66% -4.05%
60 Days -4.36% 4.74%
90 Days -0.84% 13.13%
12 Months -2.90% 28.62%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in XHS Weight in RFG Overlap
ACHC D 1.84% 0.75% 0.75%
PGNY D 1.99% 0.81% 0.81%
XHS Overweight 56 Positions Relative to RFG
Symbol Grade Weight
EHC A 2.15%
RDNT A 2.14%
THC B 2.08%
CI A 2.08%
DGX C 2.06%
HIMS B 2.06%
OMI B 2.04%
HCA B 2.02%
SEM B 2.01%
ELV A 2.01%
MCK B 2.0%
HQY C 2.0%
PINC F 2.0%
AMED D 1.99%
OPCH D 1.96%
ENSG C 1.96%
DVA B 1.96%
CHE C 1.95%
MOH C 1.94%
UHS C 1.93%
HSIC D 1.93%
LH F 1.92%
PDCO F 1.91%
BKD A 1.9%
GH F 1.9%
AMN F 1.89%
HUM D 1.88%
NEO F 1.87%
CVS D 1.87%
CAH C 1.86%
UNH C 1.86%
RCM F 1.85%
CNC C 1.84%
AGL F 1.81%
NHC C 1.8%
SGRY F 1.77%
CRVL C 1.69%
PRVA F 1.61%
ADUS A 1.55%
CYH F 1.5%
MD D 1.43%
CCRN F 1.41%
OPK C 1.4%
USPH D 1.36%
AHCO D 1.34%
ACCD D 1.32%
LFST F 1.17%
ASTH D 1.11%
PETQ F 0.97%
CSTL D 0.92%
FLGT F 0.86%
DCGO F 0.85%
ALHC D 0.79%
MODV F 0.68%
NRC F 0.5%
PNTG A 0.43%
XHS Underweight 78 Positions Relative to RFG
Symbol Grade Weight
CELH B -2.67%
CNX A -2.52%
SWN A -2.45%
VST A -2.42%
WFRD A -2.22%
PR A -2.17%
BLD B -2.15%
FIX B -2.07%
ELF C -2.06%
MEDP B -1.97%
WING A -1.88%
TOL B -1.83%
H B -1.79%
APPF C -1.76%
KNSL C -1.68%
PK B -1.59%
EME A -1.58%
MUSA A -1.54%
OC A -1.53%
OVV A -1.53%
CHRD A -1.49%
RRC A -1.46%
RMBS D -1.46%
VAL C -1.46%
RS B -1.44%
ONTO B -1.43%
EXP B -1.42%
SAIA D -1.41%
SSD D -1.38%
CLH A -1.36%
DT D -1.27%
VVV C -1.27%
NVT A -1.25%
CIVI A -1.23%
CHDN D -1.17%
WSM A -1.17%
LNTH B -1.13%
FND D -1.11%
WLK A -1.1%
NEU C -1.1%
MTDR A -1.09%
CROX B -1.09%
TXRH A -1.06%
UFPI C -1.05%
GTLS A -1.04%
ESAB A -1.04%
TREX C -1.01%
TPX C -1.01%
MANH C -1.0%
PSTG A -0.97%
LECO C -0.96%
LII B -0.96%
SKX C -0.93%
CASY A -0.93%
QLYS D -0.93%
EXEL A -0.88%
LOPE C -0.87%
PRI D -0.86%
AIT B -0.86%
WMS B -0.84%
OLED D -0.84%
VNT C -0.79%
ARWR F -0.77%
COKE C -0.77%
WSO B -0.76%
LNW D -0.75%
RBC D -0.73%
FIVE F -0.69%
PEN F -0.67%
GDDY A -0.67%
PLNT F -0.66%
BCO A -0.63%
CAR F -0.58%
BYD C -0.57%
COTY D -0.57%
DBX F -0.55%
HALO D -0.51%
FCN A -0.5%
Compare ETFs