TYLG vs. QLD ETF Comparison

Comparison of Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) to ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD)

TYLG

Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF

TYLG Description

The index measures the performance of a partially covered call strategy that holds a theoretical portfolio of the securities of the Information Technology Select Sector Index. The fund invests in the securities reflected in theindex or in investments that have economic characteristics that are substantially identical to the economic characteristics of such component securities and cannot invest directly in the index itself. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.67

Average Daily Volume

2,422

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QLD

ProShares Ultra QQQ

QLD Description

The investment seeks daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that correspond to two times (2x) the daily performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index®. The fund invests in securities and derivatives that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should have similar daily return characteristics as two times (2x) the daily return of the index. The index, a modified market capitalization-weighted index, includes 100 of the largest non-financial domestic and international issues listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$106.72

Average Daily Volume

2,632,901

Number of Holdings ^*

101

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	TYLG	QLD
30 Days	2.61%	6.38%
60 Days	5.38%	8.03%
90 Days	5.86%	8.70%
12 Months	22.78%	54.59%

30 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in TYLG	Weight in QLD	Overlap
AAPL	C	6.53%	6.06%	6.06%
ADBE	C	1.17%	1.08%	1.08%
ADI	D	0.52%	0.48%	0.48%
ADSK	A	0.34%	0.31%	0.31%
AMAT	F	0.75%	0.69%	0.69%
AMD	F	1.12%	1.03%	1.03%
ANSS	B	0.15%	0.14%	0.14%
AVGO	D	2.03%	3.68%	2.03%
CDNS	B	0.42%	0.38%	0.38%
CDW	F	0.12%	0.11%	0.11%
CRWD	B	0.4%	0.37%	0.37%
CSCO	B	1.18%	1.09%	1.09%
CTSH	B	0.2%	0.19%	0.19%
FTNT	C	0.31%	0.34%	0.31%
INTC	D	0.53%	0.49%	0.49%
INTU	C	0.98%	0.9%	0.9%
KLAC	D	0.43%	0.4%	0.4%
LRCX	F	0.48%	0.44%	0.44%
MCHP	D	0.18%	0.16%	0.16%
MSFT	F	6.02%	5.6%	5.6%
MU	D	0.55%	0.51%	0.51%
NVDA	C	6.86%	6.35%	6.35%
NXPI	D	0.28%	0.26%	0.26%
ON	D	0.14%	0.13%	0.13%
PANW	C	0.64%	0.6%	0.6%
QCOM	F	0.89%	0.82%	0.82%
ROP	B	0.3%	0.28%	0.28%
SMCI	F	0.05%	0.05%	0.05%
SNPS	B	0.43%	0.39%	0.39%
TXN	C	0.93%	0.86%	0.86%

TYLG Overweight 38 Positions Relative to QLD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CRM	B	1.64%
ORCL	B	1.51%
ACN	C	1.15%
NOW	A	1.06%
IBM	C	0.96%
PLTR	B	0.61%
ANET	C	0.5%
APH	A	0.43%
MSI	B	0.41%
FICO	B	0.28%
IT	C	0.2%
DELL	C	0.19%
HPQ	B	0.18%
GLW	B	0.18%
KEYS	A	0.14%
HPE	B	0.14%
MPWR	F	0.14%
GDDY	A	0.13%
TYL	B	0.13%
PTC	A	0.12%
TDY	B	0.12%
NTAP	C	0.12%
FSLR	F	0.1%
WDC	D	0.1%
STX	D	0.1%
ZBRA	B	0.1%
TER	D	0.09%
TRMB	B	0.09%
GEN	B	0.08%
SWKS	F	0.07%
AKAM	D	0.07%
FFIV	B	0.07%
EPAM	C	0.07%
VRSN	F	0.07%
JBL	B	0.07%
JNPR	F	0.06%
ENPH	F	0.04%
QRVO	F	0.03%

TYLG Underweight 71 Positions Relative to QLD

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AMZN	C	-3.98%
META	D	-3.57%
TSLA	B	-2.83%
COST	B	-1.89%
GOOGL	C	-1.86%
GOOG	C	-1.79%
NFLX	A	-1.63%
TMUS	B	-1.29%
PEP	F	-1.04%
LIN	D	-1.0%
ISRG	A	-0.87%
CMCSA	B	-0.78%
BKNG	A	-0.77%
AMGN	D	-0.74%
HON	B	-0.69%
VRTX	F	-0.58%
ADP	B	-0.57%
GILD	C	-0.53%
SBUX	A	-0.52%
MELI	D	-0.45%
PYPL	B	-0.41%
CTAS	B	-0.41%
REGN	F	-0.4%
MDLZ	F	-0.4%
MAR	B	-0.37%
MRVL	B	-0.36%
PDD	F	-0.35%
ORLY	B	-0.33%
CEG	D	-0.32%
CSX	B	-0.32%
DASH	A	-0.31%
ASML	F	-0.29%
PCAR	B	-0.28%
CHTR	C	-0.27%
ABNB	C	-0.27%
WDAY	B	-0.27%
CPRT	A	-0.26%
TTD	B	-0.26%
FANG	D	-0.25%
MNST	C	-0.25%
PAYX	C	-0.24%
AEP	D	-0.23%
FAST	B	-0.22%
ODFL	B	-0.22%
KDP	D	-0.21%
ROST	C	-0.21%
BKR	B	-0.2%
EA	A	-0.2%
TEAM	A	-0.19%
VRSK	A	-0.19%
XEL	A	-0.18%
GEHC	F	-0.18%
LULU	C	-0.18%
KHC	F	-0.18%
DDOG	A	-0.18%
AZN	D	-0.17%
EXC	C	-0.17%
IDXX	F	-0.16%
CCEP	C	-0.16%
ZS	C	-0.15%
TTWO	A	-0.15%
CSGP	D	-0.14%
DXCM	D	-0.13%
ILMN	D	-0.11%
GFS	C	-0.11%
WBD	C	-0.11%
BIIB	F	-0.11%
MDB	C	-0.1%
ARM	D	-0.08%
MRNA	F	-0.07%
DLTR	F	-0.06%