RFG vs. AMID ETF Comparison

Comparison of Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG) to Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID)

RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description

The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$52.61

Average Daily Volume

17,043

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

AMID Description

AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$37.03

Average Daily Volume

7,912

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	RFG	AMID
30 Days	8.80%	5.95%
60 Days	6.30%	4.28%
90 Days	6.63%	5.77%
12 Months	34.64%	35.20%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in RFG	Weight in AMID	Overlap
BLD	D	1.64%	2.43%	1.64%
CHDN	B	1.21%	1.57%	1.21%
MEDP	D	1.41%	2.69%	1.41%
MUSA	A	1.84%	2.63%	1.84%
TPX	B	0.98%	1.99%	0.98%

RFG Overweight 81 Positions Relative to AMID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CNX	A	3.65%
DUOL	A	3.18%
FIX	A	2.75%
AAON	B	2.56%
RYAN	B	2.28%
TOL	B	2.15%
EME	C	2.07%
APPF	B	1.67%
PR	B	1.67%
OC	A	1.65%
H	B	1.61%
KNSL	B	1.6%
CLH	B	1.56%
EXP	A	1.55%
WING	D	1.5%
WFRD	D	1.4%
ELF	C	1.38%
LNTH	D	1.31%
TXRH	C	1.31%
DT	C	1.29%
ANF	C	1.27%
RS	B	1.25%
RRC	B	1.25%
EXEL	B	1.24%
SSD	D	1.24%
PK	B	1.22%
FN	D	1.22%
LII	A	1.17%
SAIA	B	1.16%
VVV	F	1.16%
NVT	B	1.13%
OVV	B	1.13%
RMBS	C	1.11%
CASY	A	1.11%
AIT	A	1.1%
ESAB	B	1.09%
ONTO	D	1.09%
UFPI	B	1.08%
PRI	A	1.06%
MANH	D	1.05%
COKE	C	1.05%
RBA	A	1.02%
GTLS	B	1.02%
LOPE	B	0.97%
WSM	B	0.96%
CHRD	D	0.94%
NEU	C	0.94%
FND	C	0.93%
PLNT	A	0.93%
VAL	D	0.92%
SKX	D	0.91%
WSO	A	0.89%
ALTR	B	0.89%
CR	A	0.88%
WLK	D	0.83%
MTDR	B	0.83%
RBC	A	0.82%
CELH	F	0.79%
HLNE	B	0.79%
PSTG	D	0.79%
OLED	D	0.78%
CIVI	D	0.77%
CROX	D	0.76%
QLYS	C	0.75%
LECO	B	0.75%
TREX	C	0.69%
LNW	D	0.67%
PEN	B	0.66%
VNT	B	0.66%
ENSG	D	0.62%
WMS	D	0.62%
BCO	D	0.6%
DBX	B	0.59%
BYD	C	0.58%
HALO	F	0.55%
ARWR	F	0.52%
CAR	C	0.45%
FCN	D	0.44%
ACHC	F	0.35%
FIVE	F	0.34%
COTY	F	0.34%

RFG Underweight 32 Positions Relative to AMID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FICO	B	-3.79%
CTAS	B	-3.66%
CPRT	A	-3.56%
BLDR	D	-3.43%
FTNT	C	-3.34%
HLI	B	-3.2%
CBZ	B	-2.93%
LPLA	A	-2.87%
CDW	F	-2.86%
VCTR	B	-2.86%
DHI	D	-2.85%
IT	C	-2.83%
HCA	F	-2.49%
BAH	F	-2.45%
OMF	A	-2.4%
URI	B	-2.35%
AFG	A	-2.28%
GDDY	A	-2.24%
A	D	-2.12%
ADUS	D	-2.09%
CG	A	-2.05%
SCI	B	-2.05%
AME	A	-1.98%
ICFI	F	-1.93%
LNG	B	-1.69%
ABG	B	-1.55%
ENTG	D	-1.52%
MOH	F	-1.44%
PATK	D	-1.35%
TTEK	F	-1.33%
AX	A	-1.11%
EXPO	D	-0.99%