QQH vs. LRGC ETF Comparison

Comparison of HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH) to AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF (LRGC)

QQH

HCM Defender 100 Index ETF

QQH Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the performance of the HCM Defender 100 Index (the HCM 100 index). The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, including borrowings for investment purposes but exclusive of collateral held from securities lending, in securities included in the HCM 100 index. The HCM 100 index seeks to outperform the Solactive US Technology 100 Index, a proprietary methodology.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$65.42

Average Daily Volume

21,371

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

LRGC

AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF

LRGC Description

The fund is an actively-managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF"). The Adviser seeks to achieve the fund"s investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets in the equity securities of large-capitalization U.S. companies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$68.80

Average Daily Volume

18,107

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	QQH	LRGC
30 Days	4.28%	2.59%
60 Days	5.09%	4.16%
90 Days	8.37%	5.96%
12 Months	36.70%	32.95%

24 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in QQH	Weight in LRGC	Overlap
AAPL	C	11.9%	4.42%	4.42%
ADBE	C	1.02%	1.31%	1.02%
AEP	D	0.21%	0.76%	0.21%
AMZN	C	4.82%	4.24%	4.24%
AVGO	D	3.33%	2.18%	2.18%
BKR	B	0.19%	1.24%	0.19%
CMCSA	B	0.77%	1.12%	0.77%
COST	B	1.74%	0.72%	0.72%
CSX	B	0.28%	1.38%	0.28%
GOOG	C	2.09%	4.81%	2.09%
HON	B	0.62%	0.6%	0.6%
ILMN	D	0.1%	0.52%	0.1%
KLAC	D	0.32%	0.63%	0.32%
LIN	D	0.93%	0.92%	0.92%
META	D	4.91%	3.56%	3.56%
MSFT	F	10.8%	7.65%	7.65%
NVDA	C	5.74%	7.61%	5.74%
NXPI	D	0.23%	1.17%	0.23%
PCAR	B	0.23%	0.88%	0.23%
QCOM	F	0.83%	0.37%	0.37%
REGN	F	0.33%	0.6%	0.33%
SBUX	A	0.46%	0.64%	0.46%
TMUS	B	0.5%	1.36%	0.5%
VRTX	F	0.49%	1.12%	0.49%

QQH Overweight 70 Positions Relative to LRGC

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TQQQ	C	19.74%
TSLA	B	3.95%
GOOGL	C	2.1%
NFLX	A	1.63%
CSCO	B	1.03%
AMD	F	0.99%
PEP	F	0.94%
ISRG	A	0.78%
TXN	C	0.74%
AMAT	F	0.69%
INTU	C	0.69%
BKNG	A	0.69%
AMGN	D	0.64%
GILD	C	0.48%
ADP	B	0.48%
PANW	C	0.46%
INTC	D	0.43%
MU	D	0.43%
ADI	D	0.43%
PYPL	B	0.38%
LRCX	F	0.36%
MELI	D	0.35%
MDLZ	F	0.35%
CEG	D	0.32%
CDNS	B	0.32%
SNPS	B	0.31%
CTAS	B	0.3%
CRWD	B	0.3%
MRVL	B	0.3%
PDD	F	0.3%
MAR	B	0.29%
ORLY	B	0.28%
TTD	B	0.27%
FTNT	C	0.26%
ADSK	A	0.26%
ROP	B	0.23%
ABNB	C	0.23%
WDAY	B	0.2%
ROST	C	0.19%
FAST	B	0.19%
PAYX	C	0.18%
CPRT	A	0.18%
XEL	A	0.17%
VRSK	A	0.17%
EA	A	0.17%
EXC	C	0.16%
CHTR	C	0.16%
CTSH	B	0.16%
ODFL	B	0.16%
TEAM	A	0.15%
IDXX	F	0.14%
EBAY	D	0.14%
LULU	C	0.14%
MCHP	D	0.14%
FANG	D	0.13%
GEHC	F	0.13%
KDP	D	0.12%
MNST	C	0.12%
DXCM	D	0.12%
ON	D	0.12%
DDOG	A	0.12%
CSGP	D	0.12%
ANSS	B	0.11%
KHC	F	0.1%
BIIB	F	0.1%
CCEP	C	0.06%
MRNA	F	0.05%
BNTX	D	0.04%
SMCI	F	0.03%
GFS	C	0.01%

QQH Underweight 47 Positions Relative to LRGC

Symbol	Grade	Weight
V	A	-3.58%
UNH	C	-2.99%
ORCL	B	-2.25%
WMT	A	-2.24%
GS	A	-1.86%
WFC	A	-1.82%
SCHW	B	-1.68%
PGR	A	-1.62%
ETN	A	-1.56%
HD	A	-1.46%
BAC	A	-1.38%
MDT	D	-1.33%
IQV	D	-1.26%
EOG	A	-1.14%
DIS	B	-1.12%
FI	A	-0.98%
PLD	D	-0.97%
WAT	B	-0.95%
GEV	B	-0.95%
CTVA	C	-0.93%
KO	D	-0.92%
LYB	F	-0.83%
PG	A	-0.81%
TMO	F	-0.78%
MRK	F	-0.73%
STZ	D	-0.72%
NEE	D	-0.71%
OTIS	C	-0.7%
ZTS	D	-0.64%
CVX	A	-0.64%
AZO	C	-0.62%
TSM	B	-0.59%
NKE	D	-0.58%
DE	A	-0.56%
AMT	D	-0.55%
ELV	F	-0.55%
WTW	B	-0.53%
HUBS	A	-0.51%
PNR	A	-0.41%
CDW	F	-0.4%
EW	C	-0.4%
NOW	A	-0.38%
HCA	F	-0.38%
H	B	-0.37%
BAH	F	-0.31%
WDC	D	-0.26%
GEN	B	-0.12%