PYZ vs. IPDP ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials (PYZ) to Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP)
PYZ

PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials

PYZ Description

The PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Basic Materials Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of stocks of 60 US basic materials companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the business of producing raw materials, including paper or wood products, chemicals, construction materials, and mining and metals. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$88.25

Average Daily Volume

2,839

Number of Holdings *

50

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
IPDP

Dividend Performers ETF

IPDP Description The investment seeks to provide income; the secondary objective is capital appreciation. The fund’s investment strategy is twofold: (1) investing in dividend paying U.S. equity securities, and (2) credit spread options on an S&P 500 ETF or Index. It may also invest in equity real estate investment trusts (“REITs”). A credit spread is an options strategy that involves the purchase of one option and a sale of another option in the same class and with the same expiration but different strike prices.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$17.26

Average Daily Volume

1,312

Number of Holdings *

49

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period PYZ IPDP
30 Days -2.19% -4.68%
60 Days 3.80% -0.03%
90 Days 9.07% 1.11%
12 Months 6.89% 22.26%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in PYZ Weight in IPDP Overlap
PYZ Overweight 50 Positions Relative to IPDP
Symbol Grade Weight
STLD A 4.6%
RS B 4.4%
AVY C 4.13%
NUE A 4.09%
LYB A 3.72%
LIN C 3.67%
APD D 3.2%
ATI A 2.77%
WLK A 2.45%
RPM C 2.34%
LPX C 2.31%
FCX A 2.26%
SLVM A 2.13%
CTVA B 2.08%
WOR D 2.07%
CE B 2.06%
CLF B 2.04%
DOW B 2.02%
CRS A 2.02%
SUM C 1.99%
CBT A 1.98%
ECL C 1.93%
OLN C 1.88%
VVV C 1.87%
IFF A 1.83%
UEC B 1.8%
SMG A 1.78%
IP B 1.74%
CMC A 1.7%
FMC D 1.65%
CF B 1.64%
KWR C 1.64%
CENX A 1.6%
ESI B 1.51%
NEU C 1.49%
HWKN A 1.41%
HUN D 1.32%
OI F 1.3%
FUL B 1.28%
SXC C 1.27%
CC F 1.24%
MATV A 1.22%
MTRN D 1.2%
IOSP C 1.18%
AVNT A 1.15%
KALU A 1.07%
PCT F 1.04%
MTX C 0.96%
SCL D 0.91%
BCPC C 0.89%
PYZ Underweight 49 Positions Relative to IPDP
Symbol Grade Weight
AVGO B -2.56%
ETN A -2.48%
QCOM B -2.41%
TT B -2.33%
APH B -2.3%
KLAC C -2.29%
TRV C -2.28%
HIG A -2.26%
A C -2.25%
APOG A -2.23%
DOV B -2.23%
DCI A -2.2%
CTAS A -2.15%
GWW C -2.15%
ITT B -2.14%
AIT C -2.12%
SYK C -2.11%
SHW C -2.11%
HI B -2.1%
SEIC C -2.09%
MCK A -2.06%
RGA A -2.06%
FAST C -2.04%
AOS A -2.02%
CSX C -2.01%
HD D -2.01%
BRC B -1.97%
ABT C -1.96%
MSI A -1.95%
ELV A -1.92%
ADP C -1.89%
PAYX B -1.89%
ROK D -1.88%
ABM A -1.88%
SNA C -1.88%
GPC B -1.88%
CHE C -1.87%
WTS B -1.85%
CAH B -1.83%
CSCO D -1.83%
UPS D -1.8%
JNJ F -1.78%
MMC B -1.78%
ACN D -1.76%
NSP A -1.7%
AAPL F -1.64%
UNH B -1.45%
HUM D -1.09%
GL F -0.74%
Compare ETFs