PLDR vs. MID ETF Comparison

Comparison of Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF (PLDR) to American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID)

PLDR

Putnam Sustainable Leaders ETF

PLDR Description

The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund invests mainly in common stocks of U.S. companies of any size, with a focus on companies that exhibit a commitment to financially material sustainable business practices. Under normal circumstances, the fund invests at least 80% of the value of its net assets in securities that meet Putnam Investment Management, LLC?s (Putnam Management) sustainability criteria.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.45

Average Daily Volume

52,617

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

MID

American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF

MID Description

The investment seeks long-term capital growth. The fund will invest principally in exchange-traded common stocks. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of medium capitalization companies that the portfolio managers believe will create impact by aligning with at least one of the SDGs. The fund may purchase securities of small and large capitalization companies as well. It may engage in active and frequent trading of portfolio securities to achieve its principal investment strategies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$63.89

Average Daily Volume

4,883

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	PLDR	MID
30 Days	1.98%	5.15%
60 Days	2.45%	4.77%
90 Days	4.24%	8.34%
12 Months	33.89%	37.37%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in PLDR	Weight in MID	Overlap
CDNS	B	0.98%	2.63%	0.98%
CMG	B	1.33%	3.05%	1.33%
MSCI	C	1.12%	5.64%	1.12%
ONON	A	0.39%	2.07%	0.39%
TPG	A	1.25%	1.6%	1.25%

PLDR Overweight 49 Positions Relative to MID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
AAPL	C	8.35%
MSFT	F	7.89%
NVDA	C	5.48%
AMZN	C	4.55%
WMT	A	2.65%
V	A	2.45%
BSX	B	2.08%
LLY	F	2.05%
LIN	D	2.0%
HD	A	1.82%
ROP	B	1.74%
HLT	A	1.74%
JPM	A	1.7%
FTV	C	1.7%
AMD	F	1.64%
ISRG	A	1.63%
TMO	F	1.57%
BAC	A	1.51%
UL	D	1.51%
NEE	D	1.49%
CEG	D	1.46%
PLD	D	1.45%
OTIS	C	1.44%
ADBE	C	1.41%
REGN	F	1.34%
DHR	F	1.32%
SCHW	B	1.27%
IR	B	1.25%
BALL	D	1.24%
EMN	D	1.23%
COF	B	1.23%
CRM	B	1.21%
AMT	D	1.21%
STX	D	1.1%
GSK	F	1.1%
DIS	B	1.08%
AMAT	F	1.07%
MTD	D	1.06%
ADI	D	1.05%
TMUS	B	1.03%
SBUX	A	0.94%
ASML	F	0.93%
KKR	A	0.91%
CPB	D	0.88%
SNY	F	0.85%
SNPS	B	0.85%
ECL	D	0.65%
AZN	D	0.48%
WCN	A	0.3%

PLDR Underweight 35 Positions Relative to MID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
ESI	A	-4.85%
DUOL	A	-4.55%
MPWR	F	-4.05%
POOL	C	-4.0%
AVNT	B	-3.95%
BFAM	D	-3.94%
NET	B	-3.77%
LII	A	-3.48%
MANH	D	-3.47%
RSG	A	-3.45%
CDW	F	-2.72%
CHD	B	-2.72%
HUBB	B	-2.71%
TRGP	B	-2.44%
VST	B	-2.37%
ENPH	F	-2.26%
IDXX	F	-2.16%
NTRA	B	-2.07%
XYL	D	-1.93%
ABNB	C	-1.9%
EFX	F	-1.86%
ALNY	D	-1.78%
COR	B	-1.74%
ARGX	A	-1.69%
IQV	D	-1.59%
NU	C	-1.53%
PODD	C	-1.5%
VRT	B	-1.48%
CNM	D	-1.37%
DXCM	D	-1.33%
GEHC	F	-1.27%
TECH	D	-1.07%
BLD	D	-0.98%
AZEK	A	-0.98%
J	F	-0.87%