PDP vs. IQM ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares DWA Technical Leaders Portfolio (PDP) to Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM)
PDP

PowerShares DWA Technical Leaders Portfolio

PDP Description

The PowerShares DWA Momentum Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders™ Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index and ADRs based on the securities in the Index. The Index includes approximately 100 US-listed companies from a broad mid- and large-capitalization universe. The Index is constructed pursuant to Dorsey, Wright & Associates, LLC's proprietary methodology, which takes into account, among other factors, the performance of each of the 3,000 largest US-listed companies as compared to a benchmark index, and the relative performance of industry sectors and sub-sectors. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly. Effective on or about Oct. 4, 2013, the name of the Fund changed from PowerShares DWA Technical Leaders Portfolio to PowerShares DWA Momentum Portfolio.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$102.79

Average Daily Volume

15,072

Number of Holdings *

99

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
IQM

Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF

IQM Description The investment seeks capital appreciation. Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of companies that are relevant to its investment theme of intelligent machines. The fund invests predominantly in common stock. Although it may invest across economic sectors, the advisor expects to have significant positions in particular sectors including technology. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$63.34

Average Daily Volume

2,668

Number of Holdings *

45

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period PDP IQM
30 Days 2.77% 2.98%
60 Days 6.28% 6.13%
90 Days 5.04% -0.02%
12 Months 32.96% 43.47%
16 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in PDP Weight in IQM Overlap
AMAT D 1.05% 2.82% 1.05%
AVGO C 1.06% 2.25% 1.06%
AXON B 0.72% 3.89% 0.72%
CDNS D 2.24% 3.93% 2.24%
CRWD D 0.44% 0.77% 0.44%
ENTG D 1.39% 1.41% 1.39%
ETN C 0.53% 1.32% 0.53%
ISRG C 0.84% 5.52% 0.84%
KLAC D 1.39% 1.63% 1.39%
LRCX D 0.37% 1.34% 0.37%
NVDA C 2.65% 12.05% 2.65%
PSTG F 0.46% 0.37% 0.37%
PTC C 0.51% 1.29% 0.51%
PWR B 1.31% 2.57% 1.31%
ROP C 2.23% 0.88% 0.88%
SNPS F 1.52% 3.81% 1.52%
PDP Overweight 83 Positions Relative to IQM
Symbol Grade Weight
MA B 2.99%
TRGP C 2.77%
WRB D 2.59%
TDG B 2.51%
CPRT D 2.44%
GWW B 2.23%
APP C 2.2%
TT B 1.82%
COST C 1.7%
CTAS C 1.66%
MEDP F 1.58%
FIX B 1.51%
NVR B 1.47%
LLY D 1.45%
CMG D 1.28%
TJX C 1.22%
ELF F 1.18%
THC C 1.12%
CEG C 1.08%
FANG F 1.07%
V C 1.06%
URI B 1.02%
MTSI C 0.96%
ARES B 0.96%
HWM B 0.94%
DECK C 0.93%
FICO B 0.93%
ANET C 0.91%
BAH B 0.9%
ONTO C 0.89%
META B 0.86%
WING C 0.86%
MSFT C 0.84%
ORCL B 0.83%
KKR B 0.8%
WFRD F 0.79%
RCL B 0.79%
COKE C 0.76%
CSL B 0.76%
ENSG D 0.75%
TTEK C 0.73%
CDW D 0.72%
APO B 0.69%
IRM C 0.69%
EVR B 0.69%
CLH C 0.69%
AIT B 0.67%
PSN B 0.66%
NFLX B 0.66%
PRI B 0.65%
AJG D 0.65%
GOOGL D 0.64%
HLI C 0.64%
BRO C 0.64%
TOL A 0.64%
PHM B 0.64%
HRB C 0.64%
MAS B 0.62%
USFD C 0.62%
PH B 0.62%
NSIT C 0.61%
APG F 0.6%
HUBB B 0.6%
MUSA D 0.6%
FCNCA D 0.59%
ACGL B 0.58%
MMC C 0.56%
FLR D 0.56%
TXRH B 0.56%
NTRA C 0.56%
LDOS A 0.55%
IR B 0.53%
OC C 0.53%
HOOD C 0.52%
AME C 0.52%
KBR D 0.51%
BJ D 0.51%
WLK C 0.5%
WSM C 0.5%
BLD C 0.49%
MCK F 0.47%
CROX C 0.47%
GAP F 0.45%
PDP Underweight 29 Positions Relative to IQM
Symbol Grade Weight
AAPL C -4.45%
TSM C -4.12%
ASML F -4.09%
TSLA C -3.48%
AMD C -2.47%
TER C -1.89%
ADI C -1.81%
ADSK B -1.81%
APH C -1.64%
ANSS D -1.59%
IDXX D -1.26%
ALTR C -1.16%
UBER C -1.11%
VMI C -1.07%
NXPI D -0.86%
KEYS B -0.82%
TXN B -0.73%
TEL D -0.64%
PRCT C -0.63%
FSLR C -0.53%
ZBRA B -0.53%
VRT C -0.52%
ALGN D -0.47%
BSY C -0.43%
TRMB C -0.42%
MCHP D -0.38%
HON C -0.36%
MPWR B -0.29%
SITM B -0.27%
Compare ETFs