OUSM vs. AMID ETF Comparison

Comparison of O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF (OUSM) to Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID)

OUSM

O'Shares FTSE Russell Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF

OUSM Description

O'Shares FTSE US Small Cap Quality Dividend ETF is an exchange traded fund (ETF) that seeks investment performance that correlates generally to price and yield before fees and expenses of the FTSE USA Small Cap Qual/Vol/Yield Factor 3% Capped Index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$46.44

Average Daily Volume

94,233

Number of Holdings ^*

109

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

AMID

Argent Mid Cap ETF

AMID Description

AMID aims to outperform the Russell MidCap Index over the long term by applying Change-Based Investing strategies. The fund actively invests in stocks undergoing positive internal or external change, which the issuer believes could lead to underappreciated growth. The starting universe begins with 1,500 US mid-cap stocks that are screened for liquidity and grouped by sector. Using their proprietary Argent Alpha Model, stocks are ranked under four main categories: Value, Growth, Quality, and Stability. Stocks within each sector with positive exposure to outperforming factors are considered. The remaining companies are grouped into current and future market segments based on expected outperformance in the current or future market cycle. Finally, the fund uses fundamental analysis to select 35-50 stocks with prospect improvements at the company or industry level. Sectors may be overweighted at various times in the economic cycle. Individual securities are capped at 8%.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$37.03

Average Daily Volume

7,912

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	OUSM	AMID
30 Days	4.59%	5.95%
60 Days	4.17%	4.28%
90 Days	5.56%	5.77%
12 Months	29.77%	35.20%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in OUSM	Weight in AMID	Overlap
EXPO	D	0.74%	0.99%	0.74%
HLI	B	2.28%	3.2%	2.28%
MUSA	A	0.43%	2.63%	0.43%
SCI	B	1.76%	2.05%	1.76%
VCTR	B	0.99%	2.86%	0.99%

OUSM Overweight 104 Positions Relative to AMID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SEIC	B	2.29%
RHI	B	2.28%
LECO	B	2.21%
TXRH	C	2.19%
PINC	B	2.15%
DCI	B	2.06%
EHC	B	2.05%
MSM	C	2.04%
AVT	C	1.99%
G	B	1.97%
DLB	B	1.97%
GNTX	C	1.97%
NHC	C	1.93%
DOX	D	1.89%
MTN	C	1.88%
JNPR	F	1.87%
CHE	D	1.85%
HRB	D	1.76%
AOS	F	1.73%
WU	D	1.67%
RNR	C	1.64%
INGR	B	1.59%
SNX	C	1.58%
RLI	B	1.57%
ITT	A	1.44%
NYT	C	1.41%
OGN	D	1.41%
MLI	C	1.34%
LFUS	F	1.33%
RDN	C	1.29%
MKTX	D	1.28%
MTG	C	1.11%
LSTR	D	1.08%
EVR	B	1.08%
LEA	D	1.04%
IDCC	A	1.02%
BMI	B	0.93%
CRI	D	0.9%
APAM	B	0.9%
FELE	B	0.89%
TGNA	B	0.88%
HLNE	B	0.87%
CALM	A	0.87%
ESNT	D	0.83%
WTS	B	0.79%
UFPI	B	0.77%
BRC	D	0.77%
BWA	D	0.76%
RL	B	0.75%
CNS	B	0.73%
PRGS	A	0.72%
VSH	D	0.72%
WEN	D	0.71%
COLM	B	0.71%
CR	A	0.71%
WH	B	0.69%
TW	A	0.69%
TPR	B	0.68%
AIT	A	0.65%
AMSF	B	0.64%
SHOO	D	0.61%
FHI	A	0.59%
DHIL	A	0.56%
WMG	C	0.56%
PHIN	A	0.55%
GL	B	0.54%
PII	D	0.51%
LANC	C	0.51%
OLED	D	0.49%
WHR	B	0.48%
FLO	D	0.47%
NI	A	0.47%
CHH	A	0.42%
FSS	B	0.41%
SSD	D	0.38%
DKS	C	0.37%
CASY	A	0.36%
EBF	F	0.35%
NFG	A	0.31%
WTRG	B	0.3%
PNW	B	0.29%
REYN	D	0.26%
KFRC	D	0.26%
OGE	B	0.26%
IDA	A	0.22%
UGI	A	0.22%
JJSF	B	0.2%
WDFC	B	0.2%
PSMT	C	0.17%
UVV	B	0.16%
NJR	A	0.15%
OTTR	C	0.15%
POR	C	0.14%
MGEE	C	0.14%
OGS	A	0.14%
ALE	A	0.13%
BKH	A	0.12%
WMK	C	0.12%
SR	A	0.12%
AWR	B	0.11%
NWE	B	0.11%
CWT	D	0.1%
CPK	A	0.08%
AVA	A	0.08%

OUSM Underweight 32 Positions Relative to AMID

Symbol	Grade	Weight
FICO	B	-3.79%
CTAS	B	-3.66%
CPRT	A	-3.56%
BLDR	D	-3.43%
FTNT	C	-3.34%
CBZ	B	-2.93%
LPLA	A	-2.87%
CDW	F	-2.86%
DHI	D	-2.85%
IT	C	-2.83%
MEDP	D	-2.69%
HCA	F	-2.49%
BAH	F	-2.45%
BLD	D	-2.43%
OMF	A	-2.4%
URI	B	-2.35%
AFG	A	-2.28%
GDDY	A	-2.24%
A	D	-2.12%
ADUS	D	-2.09%
CG	A	-2.05%
TPX	B	-1.99%
AME	A	-1.98%
ICFI	F	-1.93%
LNG	B	-1.69%
CHDN	B	-1.57%
ABG	B	-1.55%
ENTG	D	-1.52%
MOH	F	-1.44%
PATK	D	-1.35%
TTEK	F	-1.33%
AX	A	-1.11%