MID vs. SIMS ETF Comparison

Comparison of American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) to SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF (SIMS)
MID

American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF

MID Description

The investment seeks long-term capital growth. The fund will invest principally in exchange-traded common stocks. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of medium capitalization companies that the portfolio managers believe will create impact by aligning with at least one of the SDGs. The fund may purchase securities of small and large capitalization companies as well. It may engage in active and frequent trading of portfolio securities to achieve its principal investment strategies. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$63.89

Average Daily Volume

4,883

Number of Holdings *

40

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
SIMS

SPDR S&P Kensho Intelligent Structures ETF

SIMS Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the S&P Kensho Intelligent Infrastructure Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index is comprised of U.S.-listed equity securities (including depositary receipts) of companies domiciled across developed and emerging markets worldwide which are included in the Intelligent Infrastructure sector as determined by a classification standard produced by the index provider. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$36.91

Average Daily Volume

1,191

Number of Holdings *

41

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period MID SIMS
30 Days 5.15% 5.33%
60 Days 4.77% 7.98%
90 Days 8.34% 6.18%
12 Months 37.37% 17.43%
2 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in MID Weight in SIMS Overlap
CNM D 1.37% 1.34% 1.34%
XYL D 1.93% 2.3% 1.93%
MID Overweight 38 Positions Relative to SIMS
Symbol Grade Weight
MSCI C 5.64%
ESI A 4.85%
DUOL A 4.55%
MPWR F 4.05%
POOL C 4.0%
AVNT B 3.95%
BFAM D 3.94%
NET B 3.77%
LII A 3.48%
MANH D 3.47%
RSG A 3.45%
CMG B 3.05%
CDW F 2.72%
CHD B 2.72%
HUBB B 2.71%
CDNS B 2.63%
TRGP B 2.44%
VST B 2.37%
ENPH F 2.26%
IDXX F 2.16%
NTRA B 2.07%
ONON A 2.07%
ABNB C 1.9%
EFX F 1.86%
ALNY D 1.78%
COR B 1.74%
ARGX A 1.69%
TPG A 1.6%
IQV D 1.59%
NU C 1.53%
PODD C 1.5%
VRT B 1.48%
DXCM D 1.33%
GEHC F 1.27%
TECH D 1.07%
BLD D 0.98%
AZEK A 0.98%
J F 0.87%
MID Underweight 39 Positions Relative to SIMS
Symbol Grade Weight
MWA B -3.62%
PNR A -3.52%
GNRC B -3.47%
WTTR B -3.34%
REZI A -3.31%
JCI C -3.18%
CARR D -3.09%
BMI B -3.08%
ITRI B -2.88%
VLTO D -2.71%
ADTN A -2.66%
TTEK F -2.55%
ALRM C -2.51%
BE B -2.29%
SLAB D -2.28%
ARLO C -2.23%
ROKU D -2.14%
PSN D -2.12%
AYI B -2.08%
SHLS F -1.96%
ERII D -1.94%
GTLS B -1.88%
NRG B -1.85%
AME A -1.81%
HON B -1.8%
CHPT F -1.64%
ROP B -1.64%
AY B -1.63%
NVEE F -1.57%
BIDU F -1.45%
ON D -1.43%
GNTX C -1.42%
BP D -1.33%
BLNK F -1.25%
CWCO C -1.03%
MVIS F -0.99%
STM F -0.94%
STEM F -0.65%
REKR F -0.47%
Compare ETFs