MGK vs. QQH ETF Comparison

Comparison of Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF (MGK) to HCM Defender 100 Index ETF (QQH)

MGK

Vanguard Mega Cap Growth ETF

MGK Description

The investment seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index. The fund employs an indexing investment approach designed to track the performance of the CRSP US Mega Cap Growth Index, which represents the growth companies of the CRSP US Mega Cap Index. The index is a free-float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index designed to measure equity market performance of mega-capitalization growth stocks. It attempts to replicate the target index by investing all, or substantially all, of its assets in the stocks that make up the index, holding each stock in approximately the same proportion as its weighting in the index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$335.89

Average Daily Volume

316,899

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

QQH

HCM Defender 100 Index ETF

QQH Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond, before fees and expenses, generally to the performance of the HCM Defender 100 Index (the HCM 100 index). The fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its net assets, including borrowings for investment purposes but exclusive of collateral held from securities lending, in securities included in the HCM 100 index. The HCM 100 index seeks to outperform the Solactive US Technology 100 Index, a proprietary methodology.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$65.42

Average Daily Volume

21,371

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	MGK	QQH
30 Days	3.49%	4.28%
60 Days	5.11%	5.09%
90 Days	6.21%	8.37%
12 Months	34.37%	36.70%

39 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in MGK	Weight in QQH	Overlap
AAPL	C	13.36%	11.9%	11.9%
ABNB	C	0.34%	0.23%	0.23%
ADBE	C	1.02%	1.02%	1.02%
ADP	B	0.37%	0.48%	0.37%
ADSK	A	0.38%	0.26%	0.26%
AMAT	F	0.75%	0.69%	0.69%
AMD	F	1.12%	0.99%	0.99%
AMZN	C	6.82%	4.82%	4.82%
AVGO	D	1.83%	3.33%	1.83%
BKNG	A	0.81%	0.69%	0.69%
CDNS	B	0.44%	0.32%	0.32%
COST	B	1.79%	1.74%	1.74%
CRWD	B	0.4%	0.3%	0.3%
FTNT	C	0.21%	0.26%	0.21%
GOOG	C	2.29%	2.09%	2.09%
GOOGL	C	2.8%	2.1%	2.1%
INTU	C	0.81%	0.69%	0.69%
ISRG	A	0.89%	0.78%	0.78%
KLAC	D	0.48%	0.32%	0.32%
LIN	D	0.58%	0.93%	0.58%
LRCX	F	0.53%	0.36%	0.36%
MAR	B	0.37%	0.29%	0.29%
META	D	4.92%	4.91%	4.91%
MNST	C	0.27%	0.12%	0.12%
MRVL	B	0.27%	0.3%	0.27%
MSFT	F	12.35%	10.8%	10.8%
NFLX	A	1.53%	1.63%	1.53%
NVDA	C	12.52%	5.74%	5.74%
ORLY	B	0.4%	0.28%	0.28%
PANW	C	0.62%	0.46%	0.46%
PAYX	C	0.21%	0.18%	0.18%
ROST	C	0.3%	0.19%	0.19%
SBUX	A	0.59%	0.46%	0.46%
SNPS	B	0.45%	0.31%	0.31%
TMUS	B	0.57%	0.5%	0.5%
TSLA	B	3.07%	3.95%	3.07%
TXN	C	0.92%	0.74%	0.74%
VRTX	F	0.64%	0.49%	0.49%
WDAY	B	0.32%	0.2%	0.2%

MGK Overweight 32 Positions Relative to QQH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LLY	F	3.19%
V	A	2.22%
MA	C	1.91%
CRM	B	1.29%
MCD	D	1.02%
NOW	A	0.94%
SPGI	C	0.77%
UBER	D	0.73%
TJX	A	0.66%
BSX	B	0.65%
BA	F	0.6%
ACN	C	0.58%
ANET	C	0.53%
AMT	D	0.53%
EQIX	A	0.49%
DIS	B	0.49%
SHW	A	0.46%
CMG	B	0.44%
ZTS	D	0.42%
MCO	B	0.4%
BX	A	0.38%
ECL	D	0.38%
SYK	C	0.37%
NKE	D	0.3%
AON	A	0.28%
HLT	A	0.24%
AZO	C	0.22%
GEV	B	0.22%
SLB	C	0.22%
SNOW	C	0.19%
EW	C	0.19%
EL	F	0.1%

MGK Underweight 55 Positions Relative to QQH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TQQQ	C	-19.74%
CSCO	B	-1.03%
PEP	F	-0.94%
QCOM	F	-0.83%
CMCSA	B	-0.77%
AMGN	D	-0.64%
HON	B	-0.62%
GILD	C	-0.48%
INTC	D	-0.43%
MU	D	-0.43%
ADI	D	-0.43%
PYPL	B	-0.38%
MELI	D	-0.35%
MDLZ	F	-0.35%
REGN	F	-0.33%
CEG	D	-0.32%
CTAS	B	-0.3%
PDD	F	-0.3%
CSX	B	-0.28%
TTD	B	-0.27%
PCAR	B	-0.23%
ROP	B	-0.23%
NXPI	D	-0.23%
AEP	D	-0.21%
BKR	B	-0.19%
FAST	B	-0.19%
CPRT	A	-0.18%
XEL	A	-0.17%
VRSK	A	-0.17%
EA	A	-0.17%
EXC	C	-0.16%
CHTR	C	-0.16%
CTSH	B	-0.16%
ODFL	B	-0.16%
TEAM	A	-0.15%
IDXX	F	-0.14%
EBAY	D	-0.14%
LULU	C	-0.14%
MCHP	D	-0.14%
FANG	D	-0.13%
GEHC	F	-0.13%
KDP	D	-0.12%
DXCM	D	-0.12%
ON	D	-0.12%
DDOG	A	-0.12%
CSGP	D	-0.12%
ANSS	B	-0.11%
ILMN	D	-0.1%
KHC	F	-0.1%
BIIB	F	-0.1%
CCEP	C	-0.06%
MRNA	F	-0.05%
BNTX	D	-0.04%
SMCI	F	-0.03%
GFS	C	-0.01%