LRNZ vs. BUL ETF Comparison

Comparison of TrueMark Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ) to Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF (BUL)
LRNZ

TrueMark Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF

LRNZ Description

LRNZ seeks to provide total return by investing in an actively managed, concentrated portfolio of companies that are significantly involved in the application of high levels of artificial intelligence. Intends to serve as a more focused alpha seeking solution to complement traditional technology-based indices Targets companies with leading-edge artificial intelligence, machine learning, or deep learning technology platforms, algorithms, or applications that we believe may provide distinct competitive advantages in an industry historically characterized by a winner-take-all consolidation behavior. Portfolio construction begins with a multi-cap investment universe comprised of secular growth companies, cyclical growth companies, and newly public companies. Actively managed by highly credentialed artificial intelligence specialist with deep field experience and robust Silicon Valley network.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$34.53

Average Daily Volume

14,197

Number of Holdings *

20

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
BUL

Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF

BUL Description The investment seeks to track the total return performance, before fees and expenses, of the Pacer US Cash Cows Growth Index. The index uses an objective, rules-based methodology to provide exposure to mid- and large-capitalization U.S. companies with high free cash flow yields. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund's total assets (exclusive of collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$39.67

Average Daily Volume

5,992

Number of Holdings *

50

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period LRNZ BUL
30 Days -11.39% -5.05%
60 Days -15.49% 2.54%
90 Days -8.09% 8.73%
12 Months 29.19% 13.32%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in LRNZ Weight in BUL Overlap
LRNZ Overweight 20 Positions Relative to BUL
Symbol Grade Weight
NVDA B 13.15%
CRWD D 8.13%
IOT D 6.48%
AMD D 6.28%
DDOG C 5.1%
SNOW F 5.01%
ESTC D 4.86%
NOW C 4.54%
S F 4.17%
ZS F 4.15%
AMZN B 3.98%
OKTA D 3.96%
PATH F 3.02%
RBLX D 3.02%
SDGR F 3.01%
TWLO D 2.6%
U F 2.09%
PRME F 1.17%
ABCL F 1.16%
RLAY F 0.94%
LRNZ Underweight 50 Positions Relative to BUL
Symbol Grade Weight
GOOGL A -5.52%
DHI C -4.93%
BKNG C -4.91%
AMAT B -4.89%
LRCX B -4.86%
AAPL F -4.75%
ROST C -4.59%
FANG A -4.3%
FTV C -3.47%
NVR B -2.98%
PHM C -2.87%
BLDR D -2.85%
VST A -2.84%
DECK D -2.61%
WLK A -2.44%
WSM A -2.33%
RS B -2.26%
CE B -2.13%
EXPE D -2.13%
GDDY A -2.11%
EME A -1.94%
OVV A -1.76%
OC A -1.73%
BLD C -1.62%
WMS C -1.54%
TOL B -1.52%
FIX B -1.28%
APA B -1.23%
SKX C -1.05%
EXP C -1.05%
WFRD A -1.03%
RRC A -1.03%
MUSA A -1.01%
DBX F -0.94%
COKE C -0.92%
CROX D -0.91%
CHRD A -0.9%
AIT C -0.89%
UFPI C -0.86%
EXEL A -0.84%
ESAB A -0.79%
VNT C -0.77%
BYD C -0.75%
QLYS D -0.73%
NEU C -0.68%
HALO D -0.6%
LNTH B -0.49%
LOPE C -0.47%
BCO A -0.47%
PGNY D -0.41%
Compare ETFs