LIT vs. PYZ ETF Comparison

Comparison of Global X Lithium ETF (LIT) to PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials (PYZ)
LIT

Global X Lithium ETF

LIT Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index and in ADRs and GDRs based on the securities in the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure broad based equity market performance of global companies involved in the lithium industry. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.48

Average Daily Volume

434,071

Number of Holdings *

7

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PYZ

PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials

PYZ Description The PowerShares Dynamic Basic Materials Sector Portfolio (Fund) is based on the Dynamic Basic Materials Sector IntellidexSM Index (Intellidex Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Intellidex Index thoroughly evaluates companies based on a variety of investment merit criteria, including: price momentum, earnings momentum, quality, management action, and value. The Underlying Intellidex Index is comprised of stocks of 60 US basic materials companies. These are companies that are principally engaged in the business of producing raw materials, including paper or wood products, chemicals, construction materials, and mining and metals. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly in February, May, August and November.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$88.49

Average Daily Volume

2,725

Number of Holdings *

50

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period LIT PYZ
30 Days -6.39% -2.24%
60 Days -1.01% 3.66%
90 Days -3.97% 8.11%
12 Months -28.16% 8.65%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in LIT Weight in PYZ Overlap
LIT Overweight 7 Positions Relative to PYZ
Symbol Grade Weight
ALB F 9.51%
SQM D 4.5%
TSLA F 3.01%
ENS D 2.46%
LCID F 1.34%
PLL F 0.17%
SLI F 0.11%
LIT Underweight 50 Positions Relative to PYZ
Symbol Grade Weight
STLD A -4.6%
RS B -4.4%
AVY C -4.13%
NUE A -4.09%
LYB A -3.72%
LIN C -3.67%
APD D -3.2%
ATI A -2.77%
WLK A -2.45%
RPM C -2.34%
LPX D -2.31%
FCX A -2.26%
SLVM A -2.13%
CTVA B -2.08%
WOR D -2.07%
CE C -2.06%
CLF B -2.04%
DOW A -2.02%
CRS A -2.02%
SUM D -1.99%
CBT A -1.98%
ECL C -1.93%
OLN C -1.88%
VVV C -1.87%
IFF A -1.83%
UEC B -1.8%
SMG A -1.78%
IP D -1.74%
CMC B -1.7%
FMC D -1.65%
CF D -1.64%
KWR D -1.64%
CENX A -1.6%
ESI B -1.51%
NEU C -1.49%
HWKN A -1.41%
HUN D -1.32%
OI F -1.3%
FUL C -1.28%
SXC B -1.27%
CC F -1.24%
MATV A -1.22%
MTRN D -1.2%
IOSP C -1.18%
AVNT A -1.15%
KALU A -1.07%
PCT F -1.04%
MTX C -0.96%
SCL D -0.91%
BCPC C -0.89%
Compare ETFs