LIT vs. PSCT ETF Comparison

Comparison of Global X Lithium ETF (LIT) to PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (PSCT)
LIT

Global X Lithium ETF

LIT Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Solactive Global Lithium Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index and in ADRs and GDRs based on the securities in the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure broad based equity market performance of global companies involved in the lithium industry. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.91

Average Daily Volume

437,595

Number of Holdings *

7

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
PSCT

PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio

PSCT Description The PowerShares S&P SmallCap Information Technology Portfolio (Fund) is based on the S&P SmallCap 600® Capped Information Technology Index (Index). The Fund will normally invest at least 90% of its total assets in common stocks that comprise the Index. The Index is designed to measure the overall performance of common stocks of US information technology companies. These companies are principally engaged in the business of providing information technology-related products and services, including computer hardware and software, Internet, electronics and semiconductors and communication technologies. The Index is a subset of the S&P SmallCap 600® Index, which is a float-adjusted, market-capitalization-weighted index reflecting the US small-cap market. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$42.74

Average Daily Volume

15,270

Number of Holdings *

61

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period LIT PSCT
30 Days -6.08% -4.49%
60 Days -1.45% -10.06%
90 Days -3.88% -9.01%
12 Months -31.59% 4.02%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in LIT Weight in PSCT Overlap
LIT Overweight 7 Positions Relative to PSCT
Symbol Grade Weight
ALB D 9.51%
SQM D 4.5%
TSLA F 3.01%
ENS D 2.46%
LCID F 1.34%
PLL F 0.17%
SLI F 0.11%
LIT Underweight 61 Positions Relative to PSCT
Symbol Grade Weight
FN D -4.73%
SPSC D -4.54%
NSIT C -3.55%
DV F -3.19%
BMI A -3.19%
ITRI A -2.85%
SEDG F -2.82%
DXC F -2.78%
BOX D -2.76%
AEIS D -2.59%
FORM B -2.56%
ACIW B -2.53%
ACLS F -2.45%
ALRM D -2.43%
BL B -2.4%
DIOD D -2.29%
SANM C -2.28%
ENV A -2.04%
KLIC D -1.93%
PLXS D -1.87%
IDCC D -1.72%
RAMP D -1.58%
PRGS F -1.55%
SMTC A -1.54%
OSIS B -1.53%
UCTT D -1.46%
VECO B -1.44%
PLUS C -1.44%
ROG F -1.38%
XRX D -1.36%
VIAV F -1.36%
CALX F -1.31%
PRFT F -1.29%
PLAB D -1.25%
MXL C -1.2%
AGYS A -1.17%
COHU F -1.08%
SITM F -1.04%
TTMI D -1.03%
EXTR F -1.02%
NTCT F -1.01%
CTS B -1.0%
KN D -1.0%
CXM F -0.99%
SGH F -0.93%
VSAT F -0.92%
HLIT F -0.87%
DGII B -0.82%
ICHR D -0.81%
ARLO B -0.76%
BHE B -0.73%
SCSC C -0.72%
PDFS F -0.7%
ATEN D -0.66%
NABL D -0.62%
CNXN C -0.51%
CRNC F -0.41%
CEVA F -0.38%
AOSL F -0.37%
CRSR F -0.36%
MEI F -0.31%
Compare ETFs