JMID vs. ICAP ETF Comparison

Comparison of Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JMID) to InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP)

JMID

Janus Henderson Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF

JMID Description

JMID is designed to capitalize on mid-cap growth opportunities within the US market. The portfolio is constructed using a proprietary quantitative model that integrates fundamental research. Security selection focuses on identifying stocks expected to outperform, based on an analysis of various combinations and weightings. The objective is to generate alpha, or returns above the benchmark index, by analyzing key growth factors. Additionally, it employs portfolio optimization techniques to maintain alignment with the benchmark's risk profile. The fund may engage in active and frequent trading.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.47

Average Daily Volume

2,902

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ICAP

InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF

ICAP Description

The investment seeks to maximize income and pursue total return opportunities. The fund, under normal conditions, will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities of companies that pay dividends during normal market conditions. The fund will invest primarily in securities of U.S. companies, but may invest in foreign securities, including securities of companies located in emerging markets. To obtain high yield and total return, the adviser will favor sectors and industries that it currently views are undervalued on a relative basis.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.09

Average Daily Volume

7,908

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	JMID	ICAP
30 Days	13.00%	3.15%
60 Days	15.60%	4.72%
90 Days		7.68%
12 Months		32.68%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in JMID	Weight in ICAP	Overlap
	ARES	A	2.06%	1.47%	1.47%
	SPG	B	1.86%	1.69%	1.69%

JMID Overweight 76 Positions Relative to ICAP

Symbol	Grade	Weight
PLTR	B	3.96%
APP	B	3.36%
AMP	A	3.08%
GWW	B	2.97%
COR	B	2.74%
IT	C	2.72%
CPAY	A	2.55%
ALL	A	2.4%
EME	C	2.37%
GDDY	A	2.35%
NU	C	2.16%
FAST	B	2.15%
VRT	B	2.12%
NTAP	C	2.08%
EXPE	B	1.98%
COIN	C	1.84%
FIX	A	1.81%
CLX	B	1.73%
BR	A	1.7%
MANH	D	1.69%
POOL	C	1.66%
CSL	C	1.6%
VEEV	C	1.59%
VRSK	A	1.49%
LNG	B	1.46%
DECK	A	1.35%
EXP	A	1.34%
TPL	A	1.34%
NRG	B	1.29%
DOCU	A	1.26%
JBL	B	1.2%
LAMR	D	1.2%
DVA	B	1.17%
LPX	B	1.03%
ALNY	D	1.02%
DXCM	D	1.01%
WAT	B	1.01%
BLDR	D	1.01%
ZBRA	B	0.99%
DT	C	0.98%
UI	A	0.95%
TPX	B	0.91%
PODD	C	0.89%
RBLX	C	0.89%
PEGA	A	0.88%
EXEL	B	0.87%
VLTO	D	0.87%
WSM	B	0.81%
PCTY	B	0.78%
SYY	B	0.76%
RMD	C	0.75%
TDC	D	0.74%
HRB	D	0.74%
NTNX	A	0.73%
MDB	C	0.71%
BSY	D	0.66%
GNRC	B	0.63%
KNSL	B	0.54%
NXST	C	0.52%
HWM	A	0.52%
MEDP	D	0.52%
PAYC	B	0.48%
CACC	D	0.48%
PPC	C	0.48%
XP	F	0.47%
DOCS	C	0.44%
APPF	B	0.43%
LOPE	B	0.41%
TTEK	F	0.4%
CVNA	B	0.38%
RNG	B	0.38%
CROX	D	0.37%
ENPH	F	0.32%
CELH	F	0.28%
FTRE	D	0.24%
TKO	B	0.18%

JMID Underweight 70 Positions Relative to ICAP

Symbol	Grade	Weight
GS	A	-4.97%
C	A	-4.23%
EQIX	A	-4.14%
CVX	A	-4.14%
MTB	A	-3.96%
KRC	C	-3.91%
AMZN	C	-3.87%
MPLX	A	-3.27%
AES	F	-3.2%
CFG	B	-3.15%
BXP	D	-3.13%
BAC	A	-3.05%
ORCL	B	-3.02%
FRT	B	-2.91%
SLMBP	C	-2.79%
DLR	B	-2.77%
AB	C	-2.37%
ARE	D	-2.06%
TFC	A	-2.05%
MS	A	-1.98%
NYMTN	D	-1.95%
AVGO	D	-1.95%
UGI	A	-1.83%
KHC	F	-1.82%
REXR	F	-1.7%
EIX	B	-1.67%
JPM	A	-1.61%
MCD	D	-1.58%
FANG	D	-1.48%
VOD	F	-1.43%
O	D	-1.28%
SO	D	-1.27%
DOW	F	-1.17%
CCI	D	-1.07%
FITB	A	-1.06%
XOM	B	-1.05%
USB	A	-1.03%
HON	B	-1.01%
KMI	A	-1.0%
BLMN	F	-0.98%
HPE	B	-0.98%
MRK	F	-0.85%
NWN	A	-0.74%
CAT	B	-0.68%
PM	B	-0.65%
IRM	D	-0.63%
RTX	C	-0.62%
MMM	D	-0.58%
MSFT	F	-0.55%
AMT	D	-0.55%
CSCO	B	-0.5%
VZ	C	-0.36%
CTDD	C	-0.33%
EPR	D	-0.31%
PAA	B	-0.3%
RRR	D	-0.26%
NEE	D	-0.26%
NEE	D	-0.21%
DUK	C	-0.21%
OKE	A	-0.19%
T	A	-0.18%
JNJ	D	-0.08%
MO	A	-0.07%
KO	D	-0.07%
ET	A	-0.03%
GD	F	-0.02%
WMB	A	-0.01%
D	C	-0.01%
UZE	B	-0.01%
UNH	C	-0.01%