IWFH vs. PGJ ETF Comparison

Comparison of iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF (IWFH) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)

IWFH

iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF

IWFH Description

The iShares Virtual Work and Life Multisector ETF seeks to track the investment results of an index composed of U.S. and non-U.S. companies that provide products, services and technologies that empower individuals to work remotely, and support increasingly virtual way of life across entertainment, wellness and learning.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$14.45

Average Daily Volume

966

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$23.74

Average Daily Volume

58,594

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	IWFH	PGJ
30 Days	-6.04%	-5.49%
60 Days	-4.99%	-2.98%
90 Days	-3.31%	6.84%
12 Months	1.93%	-13.23%

4 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in IWFH	Weight in PGJ	Overlap
DADA	F	0.37%	0.13%	0.13%
HUYA	A	0.3%	0.27%	0.27%
IQ	B	1.62%	1.34%	1.34%
MOMO	D	0.61%	0.56%	0.56%

IWFH Overweight 43 Positions Relative to PGJ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
SPOT	A	3.19%
DASH	A	2.75%
DOCU	A	2.56%
NFLX	A	2.54%
NET	D	2.42%
MNDY	D	2.26%
MSFT	B	2.26%
RNG	F	2.1%
BOX	D	2.03%
PD	F	2.0%
VRNT	D	1.93%
DUOL	B	1.9%
MTCH	F	1.9%
TYL	D	1.86%
TTWO	D	1.79%
ZM	F	1.77%
EA	D	1.76%
LRN	D	1.74%
SMAR	D	1.72%
DBX	F	1.61%
BRZE	F	1.52%
SNAP	C	1.51%
FIVN	F	1.51%
TDOC	F	1.44%
HIMS	B	1.43%
EVBG	A	1.36%
ROKU	F	1.13%
ASAN	F	1.12%
YY	B	1.08%
PTON	F	0.82%
PWSC	F	0.79%
BMBL	F	0.74%
MITK	B	0.66%
CHGG	F	0.58%
WEAV	D	0.5%
BAND	A	0.41%
CLBT	D	0.4%
RUM	D	0.31%
FUBO	F	0.3%
EGHT	F	0.29%
CCSI	F	0.24%
INST	F	0.24%
LPSN	F	0.05%

IWFH Underweight 48 Positions Relative to PGJ

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TCOM	A	-8.32%
BABA	F	-8.14%
YUMC	F	-7.24%
BIDU	F	-7.18%
NTES	D	-6.03%
JD	B	-4.8%
TME	A	-4.57%
ZTO	B	-4.23%
BEKE	D	-4.2%
HTHT	A	-3.73%
VIPS	D	-3.57%
BZ	A	-3.4%
NIO	F	-3.12%
YMM	A	-3.04%
TAL	C	-2.84%
LI	F	-2.7%
QFIN	A	-1.66%
DQ	D	-1.07%
ATHM	F	-1.06%
XPEV	F	-1.0%
MNSO	B	-0.94%
HOLI	C	-0.92%
BILI	C	-0.83%
RLX	C	-0.74%
ATAT	D	-0.64%
CSIQ	F	-0.62%
FINV	D	-0.58%
GOTU	C	-0.57%
JKS	F	-0.56%
WB	D	-0.45%
ZLAB	F	-0.43%
EH	A	-0.42%
GDS	F	-0.35%
QD	C	-0.28%
TIGR	F	-0.27%
NOAH	B	-0.27%
SOHU	A	-0.23%
CAN	F	-0.16%
LX	F	-0.15%
KC	F	-0.14%
VNET	F	-0.14%
TUYA	F	-0.13%
ZH	F	-0.12%
DDL	F	-0.11%
API	F	-0.11%
KNDI	C	-0.1%
DAO	F	-0.09%
IMAB	C	-0.07%