ICAP vs. EATZ ETF Comparison

Comparison of InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF (ICAP) to AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ)
ICAP

InfraCap Equity Income Fund ETF

ICAP Description

The investment seeks to maximize income and pursue total return opportunities. The fund, under normal conditions, will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in equity securities of companies that pay dividends during normal market conditions. The fund will invest primarily in securities of U.S. companies, but may invest in foreign securities, including securities of companies located in emerging markets. To obtain high yield and total return, the adviser will favor sectors and industries that it currently views are undervalued on a relative basis.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.09

Average Daily Volume

7,908

Number of Holdings *

72

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
EATZ

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF

EATZ Description The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.39

Average Daily Volume

2,004

Number of Holdings *

21

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period ICAP EATZ
30 Days 3.15% 9.34%
60 Days 4.72% 10.97%
90 Days 7.68% 13.58%
12 Months 32.68% 41.91%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in ICAP Weight in EATZ Overlap
MCD D 1.58% 1.45% 1.45%
ICAP Overweight 71 Positions Relative to EATZ
Symbol Grade Weight
GS A 4.97%
C A 4.23%
EQIX A 4.14%
CVX A 4.14%
MTB A 3.96%
KRC C 3.91%
AMZN C 3.87%
MPLX A 3.27%
AES F 3.2%
CFG B 3.15%
BXP D 3.13%
BAC A 3.05%
ORCL B 3.02%
FRT B 2.91%
SLMBP C 2.79%
DLR B 2.77%
AB C 2.37%
ARE D 2.06%
TFC A 2.05%
MS A 1.98%
NYMTN D 1.95%
AVGO D 1.95%
UGI A 1.83%
KHC F 1.82%
REXR F 1.7%
SPG B 1.69%
EIX B 1.67%
JPM A 1.61%
FANG D 1.48%
ARES A 1.47%
VOD F 1.43%
O D 1.28%
SO D 1.27%
DOW F 1.17%
CCI D 1.07%
FITB A 1.06%
XOM B 1.05%
USB A 1.03%
HON B 1.01%
KMI A 1.0%
BLMN F 0.98%
HPE B 0.98%
MRK F 0.85%
NWN A 0.74%
CAT B 0.68%
PM B 0.65%
IRM D 0.63%
RTX C 0.62%
MMM D 0.58%
MSFT F 0.55%
AMT D 0.55%
CSCO B 0.5%
VZ C 0.36%
CTDD C 0.33%
EPR D 0.31%
PAA B 0.3%
RRR D 0.26%
NEE D 0.26%
NEE D 0.21%
DUK C 0.21%
OKE A 0.19%
T A 0.18%
JNJ D 0.08%
MO A 0.07%
KO D 0.07%
ET A 0.03%
GD F 0.02%
WMB A 0.01%
D C 0.01%
UZE B 0.01%
UNH C 0.01%
ICAP Underweight 20 Positions Relative to EATZ
Symbol Grade Weight
EAT A -7.2%
TXRH C -6.48%
BROS B -6.28%
CAKE C -5.82%
WING D -5.36%
YUMC C -5.22%
LOCO D -4.8%
USFD A -4.77%
ARMK B -4.67%
DIN C -4.64%
PFGC B -4.56%
CASY A -4.45%
DPZ C -4.35%
SYY B -4.33%
DRI B -4.17%
SGBX F -3.94%
STKS F -3.87%
CMG B -2.42%
YUM B -1.63%
SHAK C -1.44%
Compare ETFs