HOMZ vs. ERTH ETF Comparison

Comparison of Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) to Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH)

HOMZ

Hoya Capital Housing ETF

HOMZ Description

The investment seeks to track the performance, before fees and expenses, of the Hoya Capital Housing 100TM Index. The index is a rules-based index composed of 100 companies that collectively represent the performance of the U.S. residential housing industry. The index is designed to track total spending on housing and housing-related services across the U.S. The fund attempts to invest all, or substantially all, of its assets in the component securities that make up the index. Under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the fund’s total assets (exclusive of any collateral held from securities lending) will be invested in the component securities of the index.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$50.16

Average Daily Volume

2,692

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

ERTH

Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF

ERTH Description

The Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (Fund) is based on the MSCI Global Environment Select Index (Index). The Fund will generally invest at least 90% of its total assets in securities that comprise the Index. The Index is comprised of companies that focus on offering products or services that contribute to a more environmentally sustainable economy by making a more efficient use of global resources. The Index is designed to maximize exposure to six Environmental Impact Themes: alternative energy, energy efficiency, green building, sustainable water, pollution prevention and control, and sustainable agriculture. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$41.48

Average Daily Volume

9,674

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	HOMZ	ERTH
30 Days	2.83%	-0.65%
60 Days	-1.48%	-4.93%
90 Days	2.69%	-3.45%
12 Months	39.19%	-2.65%

2 Overlapping Holdings

	Symbol	Grade	Weight in HOMZ	Weight in ERTH	Overlap
	KBH	D	1.45%	1.38%	1.38%
	MTH	D	1.34%	1.53%	1.34%

HOMZ Overweight 92 Positions Relative to ERTH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
HD	A	3.23%
LOW	D	3.2%
WELL	A	1.79%
VTR	C	1.77%
IRT	A	1.69%
UMH	C	1.67%
NXRT	B	1.64%
TOL	B	1.62%
MHO	D	1.62%
PSA	D	1.6%
NVR	D	1.59%
TMHC	B	1.57%
MAA	B	1.55%
CPT	B	1.53%
AVB	B	1.53%
EXR	D	1.52%
ESS	B	1.52%
ELS	C	1.5%
CUBE	D	1.5%
UDR	B	1.49%
DHI	D	1.48%
PHM	D	1.47%
EQR	B	1.47%
TPH	D	1.43%
LEN	D	1.41%
SUI	D	1.41%
CSR	B	1.4%
AMH	D	1.36%
ELME	D	1.31%
INVH	D	1.28%
Z	A	1.14%
COMP	B	0.92%
CVCO	A	0.9%
SKY	A	0.9%
RH	B	0.9%
WHR	B	0.86%
EXP	A	0.83%
WSM	B	0.83%
SHW	A	0.83%
LZB	B	0.81%
LPX	B	0.81%
LII	A	0.81%
RMAX	C	0.8%
MHK	D	0.79%
COST	B	0.78%
PNC	B	0.77%
CARR	D	0.77%
RDFN	D	0.77%
CFG	B	0.76%
AMZN	C	0.76%
PGR	A	0.74%
TPX	B	0.73%
MAS	D	0.73%
BECN	B	0.73%
AMWD	C	0.72%
WFC	A	0.71%
WSO	A	0.71%
ALL	A	0.7%
ORI	A	0.7%
JPM	A	0.7%
TFC	A	0.7%
MTG	C	0.7%
OC	A	0.7%
TRV	B	0.7%
LGIH	D	0.7%
FAF	A	0.7%
FNF	B	0.69%
AZEK	A	0.69%
LEG	F	0.69%
CCS	D	0.68%
BAC	A	0.68%
SSD	D	0.68%
WY	D	0.67%
BLDR	D	0.67%
RYN	D	0.67%
ABR	C	0.64%
PCH	D	0.64%
IBP	D	0.64%
RDN	C	0.63%
PPG	F	0.63%
FND	C	0.62%
STWD	C	0.61%
SNBR	F	0.59%
RKT	F	0.58%
AGNC	D	0.58%
BLD	D	0.56%
PMT	D	0.56%
AOS	F	0.55%
TREX	C	0.53%
CSGP	D	0.52%
UWMC	D	0.49%
W	F	0.47%

HOMZ Underweight 38 Positions Relative to ERTH

Symbol	Grade	Weight
TSLA	B	-7.03%
DLR	B	-5.84%
NVDA	C	-5.76%
FSLR	F	-4.43%
LI	F	-3.17%
WMS	D	-2.13%
ENPH	F	-2.01%
XPEV	C	-1.85%
RIVN	F	-1.77%
VNO	B	-1.58%
BMI	B	-1.55%
DAR	C	-1.54%
NIO	F	-1.52%
WFG	D	-1.2%
CUZ	B	-1.12%
ORA	B	-1.04%
DEI	B	-0.75%
LCID	F	-0.58%
RUN	F	-0.56%
NEP	F	-0.37%
PLUG	F	-0.36%
AAT	B	-0.34%
ARRY	C	-0.27%
ERII	D	-0.25%
BZH	B	-0.23%
BDN	C	-0.21%
PGRE	F	-0.21%
SHLS	F	-0.2%
REX	D	-0.17%
SEDG	F	-0.17%
JKS	F	-0.16%
CHPT	F	-0.1%
RDUS	C	-0.1%
TUYA	F	-0.08%
AMPS	C	-0.07%
MNTK	F	-0.06%
MERC	F	-0.06%
RENB	F	-0.05%