HELX vs. RFG ETF Comparison

Comparison of Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF (HELX) to Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF (RFG)
HELX

Franklin Genomic Advancements ETF

HELX Description

Seeks capital appreciation by investing in innovative companies related to genomic-based technologies designed to enhance the quality of life. Provides access to companies benefitting from or facilitating the use of new research including DNA sequencing, gene editing and personalized medicine Uses bottom-up fundamental research conducted by dedicated, industry-specific analysts to identify disruptive business models at the right stage for investment Actively managed by a seasoned portfolio management team that is based in Silicon Valley and has a long history of investing in the craft of innovation

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$29.46

Average Daily Volume

862

Number of Holdings *

55

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
RFG

Guggenheim S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF

RFG Description The investment seeks to replicate as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth Index Total Return. The fund will invest at least 90% of its net assets, plus any borrowings for investment purposes, in the equity securities included in the underlying index. The underlying index is narrow in focus, containing only those S&P MidCap 400 companies with strong growth characteristics as selected by S&P. It may hold up to 10% of its assets in securities not included in the underlying index. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$46.75

Average Daily Volume

42,717

Number of Holdings *

80

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period HELX RFG
30 Days -9.79% -6.06%
60 Days -6.45% 4.32%
90 Days -0.89% 12.68%
12 Months -2.83% 28.45%
1 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in HELX Weight in RFG Overlap
MEDP C 7.59% 1.97% 1.97%
HELX Overweight 54 Positions Relative to RFG
Symbol Grade Weight
TMO C 4.72%
VRTX C 4.55%
REGN C 4.43%
KRYS A 4.36%
LLY C 4.15%
DHR C 3.94%
BRKR D 3.37%
NTRA B 2.78%
CRL D 2.45%
AZN A 2.41%
CDNS C 2.35%
IONS D 2.28%
A C 2.21%
CTVA B 2.19%
RCKT F 2.17%
EXAS D 2.17%
MRNA B 1.99%
QGEN D 1.8%
BNTX F 1.63%
SRPT D 1.57%
ICLR D 1.53%
FDMT D 1.45%
NTLA F 1.38%
ALNY F 1.32%
VYGR F 1.23%
IQV C 1.16%
AZTA D 1.12%
RGEN D 1.04%
LH F 0.94%
TECH F 0.9%
CRSP F 0.86%
RARE D 0.83%
INSM D 0.82%
NBIX C 0.76%
TWST D 0.72%
BMY F 0.71%
BEAM F 0.7%
LGND B 0.69%
BIO F 0.67%
CDMO F 0.55%
SDGR F 0.54%
AVTR B 0.52%
BBIO F 0.51%
UTHR A 0.49%
DVAX D 0.48%
SLP A 0.43%
RXRX F 0.4%
ARE C 0.31%
DOCS F 0.29%
FTRE B 0.18%
VCYT F 0.15%
TXG F 0.13%
OLK D 0.12%
PACB F 0.08%
HELX Underweight 79 Positions Relative to RFG
Symbol Grade Weight
CELH D -2.67%
CNX A -2.52%
SWN A -2.45%
VST A -2.42%
WFRD A -2.22%
PR A -2.17%
BLD C -2.15%
FIX B -2.07%
ELF D -2.06%
WING A -1.88%
TOL B -1.83%
H B -1.79%
APPF D -1.76%
KNSL B -1.68%
PK B -1.59%
EME A -1.58%
MUSA A -1.54%
OC A -1.53%
OVV A -1.53%
CHRD A -1.49%
RRC A -1.46%
RMBS D -1.46%
VAL C -1.46%
RS B -1.44%
ONTO B -1.43%
EXP C -1.42%
SAIA D -1.41%
SSD D -1.38%
CLH A -1.36%
DT D -1.27%
VVV C -1.27%
NVT A -1.25%
CIVI A -1.23%
CHDN D -1.17%
WSM A -1.17%
LNTH B -1.13%
FND D -1.11%
WLK A -1.1%
NEU C -1.1%
MTDR A -1.09%
CROX D -1.09%
TXRH A -1.06%
UFPI C -1.05%
GTLS A -1.04%
ESAB A -1.04%
TREX C -1.01%
TPX C -1.01%
MANH D -1.0%
PSTG B -0.97%
LECO C -0.96%
LII C -0.96%
SKX C -0.93%
CASY A -0.93%
QLYS D -0.93%
EXEL A -0.88%
LOPE C -0.87%
PRI D -0.86%
AIT C -0.86%
WMS C -0.84%
OLED D -0.84%
PGNY D -0.81%
VNT C -0.79%
ARWR F -0.77%
COKE C -0.77%
WSO B -0.76%
LNW D -0.75%
ACHC D -0.75%
RBC D -0.73%
FIVE F -0.69%
PEN F -0.67%
GDDY A -0.67%
PLNT F -0.66%
BCO A -0.63%
CAR F -0.58%
BYD C -0.57%
COTY D -0.57%
DBX F -0.55%
HALO D -0.51%
FCN A -0.5%
Compare ETFs