FLIA vs. XHS ETF Comparison

Comparison of Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF (FLIA) to SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF (XHS)
FLIA

Franklin Liberty International Aggregate Bond ETF

FLIA Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that closely correspond, before fees and expenses, to the performance of the FTSE Italy RIC Capped Index (the FTSE Italy Capped Index). Under normal market conditions, the fund invests at least 80% of its assets in the component securities of the FTSE Italy Capped Index and in depositary receipts representing such securities. The FTSE Italy Capped Index is based on the FTSE Italy Index and is designed to measure the performance of Italian large- and mid-capitalization stocks. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$20.03

Average Daily Volume

91,187

Number of Holdings *

4

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XHS

SPDR S&P Health Care Services ETF

XHS Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of an index derived from the health care providers and services segment of a U.S. total market composite index. In seeking to track the performance of the S&P Health Care Services Select Industry Index (the "index"), the fund employs a replication strategy. It generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. The index represents the health care services industry group of the S&P Total Market Index ("S&P TMI"). It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$86.17

Average Daily Volume

5,388

Number of Holdings *

58

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period FLIA XHS
30 Days -0.40% -6.66%
60 Days -0.10% -4.36%
90 Days -0.30% -0.84%
12 Months 3.55% -2.90%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in FLIA Weight in XHS Overlap
FLIA Overweight 4 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
SYK C 0.51%
AAPL F 0.28%
ABBV C 0.26%
VZ A 0.26%
FLIA Underweight 58 Positions Relative to XHS
Symbol Grade Weight
EHC A -2.15%
RDNT A -2.14%
THC B -2.08%
CI A -2.08%
DGX C -2.06%
HIMS B -2.06%
OMI B -2.04%
HCA B -2.02%
SEM B -2.01%
ELV A -2.01%
MCK B -2.0%
HQY C -2.0%
PINC F -2.0%
PGNY D -1.99%
AMED D -1.99%
OPCH D -1.96%
ENSG C -1.96%
DVA B -1.96%
CHE C -1.95%
MOH C -1.94%
UHS C -1.93%
HSIC D -1.93%
LH F -1.92%
PDCO F -1.91%
BKD A -1.9%
GH F -1.9%
AMN F -1.89%
HUM D -1.88%
NEO F -1.87%
CVS D -1.87%
CAH C -1.86%
UNH C -1.86%
RCM F -1.85%
ACHC D -1.84%
CNC C -1.84%
AGL F -1.81%
NHC C -1.8%
SGRY F -1.77%
CRVL C -1.69%
PRVA F -1.61%
ADUS A -1.55%
CYH F -1.5%
MD D -1.43%
CCRN F -1.41%
OPK C -1.4%
USPH D -1.36%
AHCO D -1.34%
ACCD D -1.32%
LFST F -1.17%
ASTH D -1.11%
PETQ F -0.97%
CSTL D -0.92%
FLGT F -0.86%
DCGO F -0.85%
ALHC D -0.79%
MODV F -0.68%
NRC F -0.5%
PNTG A -0.43%
Compare ETFs