EATZ vs. GINX ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF (GINX)
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$29.39
Average Daily Volume
2,004
21
GINX
SGI Enhanced Global Income ETF
GINX Description
The fund is an actively-managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") and seeks to achieve its objective by (1) actively investing in global companies that offer dividend income and that trade on U.S. stock exchanges and (2) investing in options strategies that seek to generate current income. The fund uses an actively traded put and call options strategy that choose deep out-of-the-money strike prices generally expiring within 1-7 days to generate income.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.86
Average Daily Volume
6,896
93
Performance
| Period | EATZ | GINX |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 9.34% | 0.93% |
| 60 Days | 10.97% | 0.12% |
| 90 Days | 13.58% | -0.34% |
| 12 Months | 41.91% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in EATZ | Weight in GINX | Overlap |
|---|
EATZ Overweight 21 Positions Relative to GINX
EATZ Underweight 93 Positions Relative to GINX
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| C | A | -4.18% | |
| TAK | F | -3.79% | |
| INFY | B | -3.7% | |
| CL | D | -3.68% | |
| NGG | D | -3.63% | |
| META | D | -3.44% | |
| GOOG | C | -3.25% | |
| UMC | F | -3.15% | |
| LLY | F | -3.04% | |
| WCC | B | -3.01% | |
| QCOM | F | -2.48% | |
| NTES | D | -2.15% | |
| MRK | F | -2.11% | |
| UPS | C | -2.04% | |
| WIT | A | -1.85% | |
| LPX | B | -1.62% | |
| NVO | D | -1.51% | |
| CBRE | B | -1.37% | |
| NICE | C | -1.36% | |
| KOF | F | -1.32% | |
| CSX | B | -1.3% | |
| CWEN | C | -1.1% | |
| LRCX | F | -1.09% | |
| BRK.A | B | -0.99% | |
| UNP | C | -0.95% | |
| KO | D | -0.93% | |
| MBI | B | -0.92% | |
| ABBV | D | -0.88% | |
| PGR | A | -0.78% | |
| IBN | C | -0.76% | |
| BBVA | F | -0.75% | |
| BK | A | -0.66% | |
| WF | C | -0.62% | |
| MCK | B | -0.6% | |
| CFG | B | -0.59% | |
| AXP | A | -0.57% | |
| TPR | B | -0.57% | |
| BAC | A | -0.56% | |
| ALL | A | -0.56% | |
| AEP | D | -0.56% | |
| TSN | B | -0.55% | |
| EOG | A | -0.55% | |
| JPM | A | -0.55% | |
| UFPI | B | -0.54% | |
| FDX | B | -0.54% | |
| CIG | C | -0.54% | |
| MKL | A | -0.54% | |
| BPOP | B | -0.54% | |
| EVRG | A | -0.53% | |
| TJX | A | -0.53% | |
| EQH | B | -0.53% | |
| PRU | A | -0.52% | |
| SWX | B | -0.52% | |
| IX | F | -0.52% | |
| INGR | B | -0.52% | |
| BBWI | D | -0.52% | |
| CIB | B | -0.51% | |
| APH | A | -0.51% | |
| PSX | C | -0.51% | |
| JXN | C | -0.51% | |
| PBR | C | -0.51% | |
| MA | C | -0.51% | |
| NFG | A | -0.5% | |
| UHS | D | -0.5% | |
| VIPS | F | -0.5% | |
| COST | B | -0.5% | |
| TGT | F | -0.5% | |
| DE | A | -0.49% | |
| OXY | D | -0.49% | |
| SAN | F | -0.49% | |
| DD | D | -0.49% | |
| ASR | D | -0.49% | |
| LMT | D | -0.48% | |
| RPRX | D | -0.48% | |
| HCA | F | -0.48% | |
| DUK | C | -0.48% | |
| SAP | B | -0.48% | |
| LOGI | D | -0.48% | |
| RDY | F | -0.47% | |
| UL | D | -0.47% | |
| ELV | F | -0.47% | |
| RIO | D | -0.47% | |
| BABA | D | -0.46% | |
| TSM | B | -0.46% | |
| SHG | D | -0.46% | |
| AMAT | F | -0.45% | |
| ZTO | F | -0.44% | |
| JD | D | -0.44% | |
| SNN | D | -0.44% | |
| HMC | F | -0.43% | |
| TLK | D | -0.43% | |
| REGN | F | -0.4% | |
| MPWR | F | -0.31% |
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
GINX: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
