EATZ vs. FCTE ETF Comparison
Comparison of AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ) to SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF (FCTE)
EATZ
AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF
EATZ Description
The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$29.39
Average Daily Volume
2,004
21
FCTE
SMI 3Fourteen Full-Cycle Trend ETF
FCTE Description
The fund is actively managed and typically owns 20 domestic stocks that are normally included in the S&P 500 Index ("S&P 500"). The FCT strategy is based on a proprietary model developed by 3Fourteen that selects stocks based on quality stock screens and trend factors such as return on capital and cash flow stability, earnings growth, return on investment, momentum, linear regression and trend analysis. The fund is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.77
Average Daily Volume
109,194
20
Performance
| Period | EATZ | FCTE |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 9.34% | 0.07% |
| 60 Days | 10.97% | -1.88% |
| 90 Days | 13.58% | -1.70% |
| 12 Months | 41.91% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in EATZ | Weight in FCTE | Overlap |
|---|
EATZ Overweight 21 Positions Relative to FCTE
EATZ Underweight 20 Positions Relative to FCTE
EATZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
FCTE: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
