CHIQ vs. KWEB ETF Comparison

Comparison of Global X China Consumer ETF (CHIQ) to KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB)

CHIQ

Global X China Consumer ETF

CHIQ Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the Solactive China Consumer Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index and in ADRs and GDRs based on the securities in the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure the equity performance of the investable universe of companies in the consumer sector of the Chinese economy, as defined by Structured Solutions AG. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$17.65

Average Daily Volume

56,700

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

KWEB

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

KWEB Description

The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of a specific foreign equity securities benchmark. The fund will normally invest at least 80% of its total assets in equity securities of its current benchmark, the CSI Overseas China Internet Index or in depositary receipts representing securities of the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to measure the performance of the investable universe of publicly traded China-based companies whose primary business or businesses are in the Internet and Internet-related sectors. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$27.33

Average Daily Volume

18,795,893

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	CHIQ	KWEB
30 Days	3.16%	4.23%
60 Days	4.62%	5.36%
90 Days	9.83%	9.58%
12 Months	-2.10%	0.35%

5 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in CHIQ	Weight in KWEB	Overlap
BABA	D	8.27%	9.15%	8.27%
PDD	B	7.3%	6.59%	6.59%
TAL	C	1.68%	3.56%	1.68%
TCOM	A	5.91%	5.69%	5.69%
VIPS	F	1.75%	3.7%	1.75%

CHIQ Overweight 5 Positions Relative to KWEB

Symbol	Grade	Weight
LI	F	3.59%
YUMC	D	3.32%
HTHT	A	2.0%
NIO	F	1.13%
XPEV	F	0.96%

CHIQ Underweight 11 Positions Relative to KWEB

Symbol	Grade	Weight
BZ	A	-4.81%
TME	A	-4.66%
YMM	A	-4.49%
BEKE	C	-3.57%
BIDU	F	-3.52%
BILI	B	-1.96%
QFIN	A	-1.84%
IQ	A	-1.44%
ATHM	F	-1.14%
YY	B	-0.72%
WB	D	-0.44%