CHIC vs. FNGU ETF Comparison
Comparison of Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF (CHIC) to BMO REX MicroSectors FANG Index 3X Leveraged Exchange Traded Notes (FNGU)
CHIC
Global X MSCI China Communication Services ETF
CHIC Description
The investment seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance, before fees and expenses, of the NASDAQ OMX China Technology Index. The fund invests at least 80% of its total assets in the securities of the underlying index and in American Depositary Receipts ("ADRs") and Global Depositary Receipts ("GDRs") based on the securities in the underlying index. The underlying index is designed to track the performance of the technology sector in China. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$12.25
Average Daily Volume
3,430
8
FNGU
BMO REX MicroSectors FANG Index 3X Leveraged Exchange Traded Notes
FNGU Description
The investment seeks return linked to a three times leveraged participation in the daily performance of the NYSE FANG+™ Index, total return (the “index”). The notes are intended to be daily trading tools for sophisticated investors to manage daily trading risks as part of an overall diversified portfolio. The index is an equal-dollar weighted index designed to represent a segment of the technology and consumer discretionary sectors consisting of highly-traded growth stocks of technology and tech-enabled companies.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$327.74
Average Daily Volume
1,214,073
10
Performance
Period | CHIC | FNGU |
---|---|---|
30 Days | 4.12% | -1.03% |
60 Days | -10.40% | 22.93% |
90 Days | -13.58% | 39.08% |
12 Months | -24.22% | 282.63% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol | Grade | Weight in CHIC | Weight in FNGU | Overlap |
---|
CHIC: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
FNGU: Top Represented Industries & Keywords