BUSA vs. SAEF ETF Comparison

Comparison of Brandes U.S. Value ETF (BUSA) to Schwab Ariel ESG ETF (SAEF)

BUSA

Brandes U.S. Value ETF

BUSA Description

The fund is an actively managed exchange-traded fund ("ETF") that seeks to attain its investment objective by investing primarily in equity securities of U.S. companies. Under normal market conditions, the fund will invest at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes), measured at the time of purchase, in securities of U.S. companies.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$33.62

Average Daily Volume

25,043

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

SAEF

Schwab Ariel ESG ETF

SAEF Description

Schwab Ariel ESG ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc. The fund is co-managed by Ariel Investments, LLC. It invests in the public equity markets of the United States. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of diverse market cap companies, within the market capitalization range of the Russell 2500 Index. The fund invests in stocks of companies that are deemed socially conscious in their business dealings and directly promote environmental responsibility. It employs fundamental and quantitative analysis with bottom-up stock picking approach to create its portfolio. It employs proprietary research to create its portfolio. Schwab Ariel ESG ETF was formed on November 16, 2021 and is domiciled in the United States.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.88

Average Daily Volume

2,765

Number of Holdings ^*

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market

Performance

Period	BUSA	SAEF
30 Days	4.78%	8.53%
60 Days	6.46%	9.20%
90 Days	6.78%	11.05%
12 Months	29.83%	40.04%

3 Overlapping Holdings

Symbol	Grade	Weight in BUSA	Weight in SAEF	Overlap
FI	A	3.53%	3.4%	3.4%
LH	C	1.49%	1.23%	1.23%
MHK	D	0.83%	1.22%	0.83%

BUSA Overweight 52 Positions Relative to SAEF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
CVX	A	3.36%
MCK	B	3.11%
WFC	A	2.9%
BAC	A	2.86%
FLEX	A	2.58%
PNC	B	2.57%
CMCSA	B	2.48%
GOOG	C	2.41%
WTW	B	2.4%
C	A	2.38%
DOX	D	2.34%
CI	F	2.26%
FDX	B	2.24%
JPM	A	2.2%
CTVA	C	2.18%
HAL	C	2.11%
EMR	A	2.1%
CTSH	B	2.06%
TXT	D	2.05%
OMC	C	2.04%
SSNC	B	2.02%
SNY	F	1.96%
PFE	D	1.95%
BK	A	1.95%
MRK	F	1.92%
WRB	A	1.91%
JNJ	D	1.77%
INGR	B	1.69%
HCA	F	1.68%
AIG	B	1.61%
CAH	B	1.57%
ETR	B	1.55%
KVUE	A	1.53%
ACGL	D	1.44%
AZO	C	1.43%
MU	D	1.31%
STT	A	1.28%
CVS	D	1.19%
LKQ	D	1.15%
WKC	D	1.09%
KNX	B	1.08%
TFC	A	1.08%
CSCO	B	1.06%
OMF	A	1.02%
GTES	A	1.01%
SLB	C	0.99%
BRK.A	B	0.98%
SYY	B	0.96%
GD	F	0.91%
JCI	C	0.87%
OTEX	D	0.54%
QRVO	F	0.5%

BUSA Underweight 54 Positions Relative to SAEF

Symbol	Grade	Weight
OSW	A	-4.39%
BCO	D	-4.21%
NCLH	B	-3.64%
LIND	C	-3.32%
KKR	A	-2.42%
FAF	A	-2.41%
GNRC	B	-2.41%
ZBRA	B	-2.3%
NVT	B	-2.29%
JLL	D	-2.28%
GS	A	-2.24%
REZI	A	-2.14%
NTRS	A	-2.09%
FICO	B	-2.08%
PBH	A	-2.04%
MAT	D	-1.81%
KMT	B	-1.8%
CBRE	B	-1.79%
CRL	C	-1.78%
GNTX	C	-1.76%
MIDD	C	-1.71%
KEYS	A	-1.65%
LFUS	F	-1.57%
WEX	D	-1.54%
KN	B	-1.53%
MTB	A	-1.53%
DNB	B	-1.5%
AXTA	A	-1.41%
MSI	B	-1.41%
MANU	C	-1.41%
NVST	B	-1.31%
MAS	D	-1.29%
BIO	D	-1.28%
MSGS	A	-1.26%
ZBH	C	-1.25%
ADTN	A	-1.24%
IPG	D	-1.22%
SSD	D	-1.21%
ST	F	-1.21%
SNA	A	-1.19%
BRC	D	-1.16%
ATGE	B	-1.15%
AFL	B	-1.13%
MSGE	F	-1.1%
BWA	D	-1.09%
KMX	B	-0.98%
KFY	B	-0.97%
SJM	D	-0.94%
PGR	A	-0.92%
REYN	D	-0.91%
LESL	C	-0.86%
HCKT	B	-0.83%
PARA	C	-0.56%
PHIN	A	-0.28%