AMNA vs. UMI ETF Comparison

Comparison of ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) to USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund (UMI)
AMNA

ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN

AMNA Description

The investment seeks to provide an unleveraged long exposure to the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Index, subject to a Daily Tracking Fee. The index is a broad based composite of North American energy infrastructure companies that earn the majority of their cash flow from midstream energy activities involving energy commodities. Investing in the Securities involves significant risks.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$41.51

Average Daily Volume

33

Number of Holdings *

11

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
UMI

USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund

UMI Description The investment seeks a high level of current income; as a secondary objective, the fund seeks capital appreciation. The fund will seek to achieve its investment objectives by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of U.S. and Canadian companies of any market capitalization deemed by the Sub-Adviser to be engaged in the midstream energy sector. It will invest more than 25% of the value of its total assets in the energy, oil, and gas industries. The fund is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$40.34

Average Daily Volume

10,951

Number of Holdings *

18

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period AMNA UMI
30 Days 0.37% 2.00%
60 Days 5.41% 7.10%
90 Days 9.93% 12.43%
12 Months 19.69% 26.14%
5 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in AMNA Weight in UMI Overlap
AM A 1.05% 4.74% 1.05%
ETRN A 1.2% 4.44% 1.2%
HESM A 0.18% 2.26% 0.18%
KMI A 9.34% 4.39% 4.39%
MPLX A 3.41% 4.66% 3.41%
Compare ETFs