SEMI vs. TDV ETF Comparison
Comparison of Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF (SEMI) to ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF (TDV)
SEMI
Columbia Seligman Semiconductor and Technology ETF
SEMI Description
SEMI is designed to provide exposure to the broad information technology sector by focusing on pure-play companies related to the semiconductor industry. The fund actively and generally invests in 30-50 high-conviction semiconductor or semiconductor-related firms, as defined by GICS, including those under communication equipment, electronic equipment, technology hardware, storage and peripherals, and software. Additionally, the fund requires at least 25% of its assets be invested in companies in the semiconductor and semiconductor equipment industry. Security selection is done through extensive in-depth research. SEMI is a non-transparent ETF and does not provide daily disclosure of its portfolio holdings unlike other ETFs. As such, there is a risk that shares of the fund may trade at wider spreads, especially during periods of volatility. The fund instead publishes a trading basket daily, which provides a preview of selected holdings without disclosing the actual portfolio.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$26.46
Average Daily Volume
4,194
33
TDV
ProShares S&P Global Technology Dividend Aristocrats ETF
TDV Description
The investment seeks investment results, before fees and expenses, that track the performance of the S&P Technology Dividend Aristocrats Index (the index). The index, constructed and maintained by S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC, targets companies from the U.S. technology sector and select U.S. technology-related companies from the communication services and consumer discretionary sectors. Under normal circumstances, the fund will invest at least 80% of its total assets in component securities. It is non-diversified.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$73.39
Average Daily Volume
18,215
35
Performance
| Period | SEMI | TDV |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 9.06% | 6.83% |
| 60 Days | 12.35% | 3.09% |
| 90 Days | 13.47% | 4.08% |
| 12 Months | 51.72% | 25.02% |
SEMI Overweight 26 Positions Relative to TDV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| SMTC | B | 6.94% | |
| NVDA | B | 4.82% | |
| AMAT | C | 4.63% | |
| NXPI | A | 4.37% | |
| MRVL | D | 4.24% | |
| ON | F | 3.84% | |
| TSM | B | 3.3% | |
| TER | A | 3.27% | |
| WDC | B | 3.18% | |
| QRVO | F | 2.73% | |
| INDI | F | 2.36% | |
| SYNA | F | 2.05% | |
| MU | B | 1.92% | |
| BE | D | 1.88% | |
| STM | D | 1.87% | |
| SNPS | D | 1.85% | |
| AEIS | B | 1.82% | |
| CDNS | D | 1.77% | |
| INTC | F | 1.39% | |
| SGH | F | 0.7% | |
| ICHR | D | 0.66% | |
| AMD | D | 0.65% | |
| KLIC | D | 0.6% | |
| DIOD | D | 0.5% | |
| MKSI | C | 0.49% | |
| ENTG | D | 0.42% |
SEMI Underweight 28 Positions Relative to TDV
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| POWI | C | -3.29% | |
| CGNX | B | -3.25% | |
| TXN | A | -3.11% | |
| APH | A | -3.1% | |
| LFUS | B | -3.05% | |
| AVT | A | -3.02% | |
| AAPL | B | -2.99% | |
| BMI | A | -2.97% | |
| GLW | B | -2.93% | |
| CASS | D | -2.89% | |
| HPQ | C | -2.86% | |
| DLB | C | -2.85% | |
| MSI | A | -2.85% | |
| INTU | D | -2.82% | |
| SSNC | C | -2.79% | |
| MSFT | C | -2.78% | |
| TEL | A | -2.78% | |
| V | C | -2.77% | |
| ORCL | D | -2.76% | |
| JKHY | C | -2.7% | |
| MA | D | -2.69% | |
| CSCO | D | -2.68% | |
| ACN | D | -2.66% | |
| BR | D | -2.66% | |
| ROP | D | -2.63% | |
| CDW | D | -2.52% | |
| IBM | D | -2.52% | |
| CSGS | F | -2.29% |
SEMI: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
TDV: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
