PGJ vs. XITK ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK)
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$24.41

Average Daily Volume

51,421

Number of Holdings *

51

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
XITK

SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF

XITK Description The investment seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of the FactSet Innovative Technology Index. The index is designed to represent the performance of U.S.-listed stock and American Depository Receipts of Technology companies and Technology-related companies within the most innovative segments of the Technology sector and Electronic Media sub-sector of the Media sector, as defined by FactSet Research Systems, Inc. The fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 80%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the index. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$142.30

Average Daily Volume

3,864

Number of Holdings *

98

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period PGJ XITK
30 Days -13.22% -3.69%
60 Days 3.12% 4.90%
90 Days -2.55% -2.53%
12 Months -13.01% 8.07%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in PGJ Weight in XITK Overlap
PGJ Overweight 51 Positions Relative to XITK
Symbol Grade Weight
BABA D 8.59%
TCOM D 8.53%
BIDU F 6.78%
YUMC F 6.6%
NTES D 5.76%
TME B 5.52%
JD D 5.23%
ZTO C 4.94%
BEKE C 4.74%
BZ B 3.83%
NIO F 3.39%
VIPS F 3.37%
HTHT F 3.37%
YMM B 3.35%
TAL D 2.55%
LI F 1.72%
QFIN C 1.65%
IQ F 1.29%
ATHM C 1.11%
XPEV F 1.0%
BILI B 1.0%
MNSO F 0.93%
DQ F 0.9%
HOLI F 0.79%
RLX F 0.75%
CSIQ D 0.68%
ATAT C 0.63%
JKS D 0.6%
ZLAB C 0.54%
MOMO D 0.54%
FINV C 0.53%
GOTU D 0.47%
GDS C 0.45%
WB F 0.45%
TIGR C 0.35%
EH F 0.35%
HUYA D 0.25%
SOHU B 0.25%
NOAH F 0.2%
VNET C 0.19%
QD D 0.19%
DDL C 0.16%
LX F 0.15%
TUYA F 0.14%
KC F 0.13%
CAN C 0.13%
API F 0.11%
DOYU B 0.1%
DADA F 0.1%
DAO D 0.08%
IMAB C 0.07%
PGJ Underweight 98 Positions Relative to XITK
Symbol Grade Weight
SMCI C -2.73%
NVDA B -2.43%
APP B -2.12%
PI C -1.74%
HCP A -1.56%
QTWO B -1.54%
SPOT B -1.5%
ONTO B -1.5%
MGNI B -1.47%
META B -1.41%
CRWD A -1.4%
TOST C -1.38%
KD B -1.37%
KLAC A -1.37%
ARLO B -1.37%
NFLX A -1.35%
DAKT B -1.29%
TTD A -1.28%
MPWR A -1.27%
AMD C -1.26%
MNDY B -1.22%
PINS A -1.21%
PUBM D -1.19%
OKTA C -1.17%
DOCS C -1.16%
CYBR B -1.15%
DOCN C -1.15%
PRFT B -1.11%
FTNT D -1.1%
AGYS B -1.09%
AEIS B -1.06%
PEGA D -1.06%
SSNC D -1.04%
CHKP B -1.04%
PAR B -1.04%
SEIC D -1.04%
VEEV F -1.03%
DOCU D -1.01%
CWAN C -1.0%
ASGN D -0.99%
SITM B -0.99%
NCNO C -0.98%
SMAR C -0.97%
SPSC B -0.97%
TENB F -0.95%
EA B -0.95%
INTA D -0.93%
DDOG C -0.93%
G D -0.93%
VRNS C -0.93%
ALIT F -0.91%
SQ F -0.91%
CTSH D -0.9%
GFS C -0.88%
Z C -0.88%
FVRR D -0.88%
ZS C -0.87%
JAMF F -0.87%
RAMP F -0.87%
IOT F -0.87%
MXL D -0.86%
PDFS C -0.86%
DOX F -0.85%
DUOL C -0.85%
RBLX C -0.84%
LSPD C -0.83%
DT F -0.82%
CALX C -0.81%
TWLO F -0.78%
ZI F -0.76%
OLO F -0.75%
PRO F -0.73%
UPWK F -0.73%
TDC D -0.72%
APPN F -0.72%
GTLB F -0.71%
S D -0.69%
CLVT F -0.68%
QLYS F -0.68%
ASAN F -0.67%
ZIP F -0.67%
BRZE F -0.65%
GLOB F -0.65%
RPD F -0.64%
UPST D -0.64%
EPAM F -0.64%
CNXC D -0.63%
IAS D -0.63%
RIOT C -0.59%
MDB F -0.57%
OPEN F -0.56%
ROKU F -0.54%
DV F -0.54%
U F -0.51%
PATH F -0.47%
FSLY F -0.42%
APPS F -0.25%
YNDX C -0.0%
Compare ETFs