PGJ vs. EATZ ETF Comparison

Comparison of PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ) to AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (EATZ)
PGJ

PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio

PGJ Description

The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$28.21

Average Daily Volume

62,777

Number of Holdings *

52

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
EATZ

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF

EATZ Description The investment seeks long-term capital appreciation. The fund is an actively managed ETF that seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in securities of companies that derive at least 50% of their net revenue from the restaurant business. It invests primarily in U.S. exchange listed equity securities, including common and preferred stock and ADRs. The fund will concentrate at least 25% of its investments in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry within the Consumer Discretionary Sector. It is non-diversified.

Grade (RS Rating)

Last Trade

$24.28

Average Daily Volume

1,437

Number of Holdings *

24

* may have additional holdings in another (foreign) market
Performance
Period PGJ EATZ
30 Days 19.69% 6.29%
60 Days 11.72% 1.60%
90 Days 15.28% 3.83%
12 Months 10.99% 14.32%
0 Overlapping Holdings
Symbol Grade Weight in PGJ Weight in EATZ Overlap
PGJ Overweight 52 Positions Relative to EATZ
Symbol Grade Weight
TCOM B 8.48%
BABA C 8.18%
BIDU D 7.37%
YUMC D 6.71%
NTES C 5.75%
JD C 5.45%
TME B 4.88%
BEKE C 4.67%
ZTO C 4.1%
HTHT C 3.62%
NIO D 3.5%
BZ B 3.4%
VIPS D 3.19%
YMM B 3.09%
TAL C 2.89%
LI F 2.27%
QFIN B 1.58%
IQ C 1.43%
ATHM C 1.07%
MNSO C 1.03%
XPEV D 0.91%
BILI C 0.89%
HOLI F 0.81%
RLX C 0.78%
DQ F 0.77%
CSIQ F 0.63%
ATAT D 0.62%
GOTU B 0.6%
MOMO D 0.59%
JKS F 0.57%
FINV C 0.55%
WB D 0.49%
ZLAB D 0.45%
GDS C 0.4%
EH C 0.38%
TIGR C 0.29%
NOAH C 0.28%
QD F 0.26%
HUYA B 0.24%
SOHU C 0.22%
VNET D 0.16%
KC D 0.15%
LX C 0.15%
DDL D 0.13%
API C 0.12%
DADA F 0.12%
TUYA C 0.12%
ZH D 0.11%
CAN F 0.11%
DOYU C 0.1%
DAO F 0.08%
IMAB F 0.07%
PGJ Underweight 24 Positions Relative to EATZ
Symbol Grade Weight
EAT B -6.22%
WING C -5.77%
CMG B -5.52%
DPZ C -5.3%
ARCO F -4.9%
BROS B -4.83%
DIN F -4.45%
YUM B -4.38%
CASY B -4.32%
PTLO F -3.58%
ARMK B -3.55%
MCD F -3.5%
TXRH B -3.46%
DRI F -3.39%
LOCO C -3.36%
CHUY F -3.25%
SHAK D -3.19%
USFD B -2.81%
PLAY D -2.6%
BLMN F -2.47%
SBUX F -2.24%
JACK F -1.95%
BJRI C -1.49%
PBPB F -1.16%
Compare ETFs