MID vs. LRNZ ETF Comparison
Comparison of American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF (MID) to TrueMark Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF (LRNZ)
MID
American Century Mid Cap Growth Impact ETF
MID Description
The investment seeks long-term capital growth. The fund will invest principally in exchange-traded common stocks. Under normal market conditions, the portfolio managers will invest at least 80% of the fund's assets in securities of medium capitalization companies that the portfolio managers believe will create impact by aligning with at least one of the SDGs. The fund may purchase securities of small and large capitalization companies as well. It may engage in active and frequent trading of portfolio securities to achieve its principal investment strategies. The fund is non-diversified.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$57.02
Average Daily Volume
4,631
34
LRNZ
TrueMark Technology, AI & Deep Learning ETF
LRNZ Description
LRNZ seeks to provide total return by investing in an actively managed, concentrated portfolio of companies that are significantly involved in the application of high levels of artificial intelligence. Intends to serve as a more focused alpha seeking solution to complement traditional technology-based indices Targets companies with leading-edge artificial intelligence, machine learning, or deep learning technology platforms, algorithms, or applications that we believe may provide distinct competitive advantages in an industry historically characterized by a winner-take-all consolidation behavior. Portfolio construction begins with a multi-cap investment universe comprised of secular growth companies, cyclical growth companies, and newly public companies. Actively managed by highly credentialed artificial intelligence specialist with deep field experience and robust Silicon Valley network.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$38.58
Average Daily Volume
8,573
20
Performance
| Period | MID | LRNZ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 3.30% | 6.96% |
| 60 Days | -0.12% | -1.65% |
| 90 Days | 5.56% | -3.50% |
| 12 Months | 29.42% | 30.84% |
0 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in MID | Weight in LRNZ | Overlap |
|---|
MID Overweight 34 Positions Relative to LRNZ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MANH | D | 6.1% | |
| CDNS | D | 5.67% | |
| MPWR | B | 5.59% | |
| RSG | B | 4.79% | |
| VRT | B | 4.68% | |
| MSCI | D | 4.14% | |
| ESI | D | 4.01% | |
| DXCM | D | 3.98% | |
| AVNT | B | 3.83% | |
| IQV | D | 3.8% | |
| TT | A | 3.63% | |
| ABNB | D | 3.6% | |
| CMG | A | 3.58% | |
| BFAM | C | 3.43% | |
| DUOL | D | 2.94% | |
| CHD | A | 2.89% | |
| HUBB | C | 2.81% | |
| KEYS | D | 2.78% | |
| XYL | A | 2.63% | |
| TECH | B | 2.53% | |
| J | D | 2.45% | |
| GEHC | D | 2.11% | |
| INSP | D | 1.99% | |
| ENPH | F | 1.98% | |
| NTRA | B | 1.95% | |
| EE | B | 1.93% | |
| SWAV | A | 1.64% | |
| ONON | D | 1.57% | |
| PODD | D | 1.56% | |
| ARGX | D | 1.5% | |
| EFX | D | 0.99% | |
| CNM | A | 0.98% | |
| ALNY | C | 0.89% | |
| VKTX | C | 0.75% |
MID Underweight 20 Positions Relative to LRNZ
MID: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
LRNZ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
