MEMS vs. PGJ ETF Comparison
Comparison of Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF (MEMS) to PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (PGJ)
MEMS
Matthews Emerging Markets Discovery Active ETF
MEMS Description
MEMS aims to capitalize on growth opportunities within the emerging market space, including frontier markets. With a primary focus on small companies, the fund allocates at least 65% of its assets to the common and preferred stocks of these enterprises, with the remaining portion comprising mid-cap companies. The fund seeks sustainable growth based on fundamental characteristics such as balance sheet strength, employee count, cash flow stability, management quality, product lines, marketing strategies, corporate governance, and financial health. Additionally, exclusionary ESG screens may be employed to avoid controversial businesses, such as tobacco, weapons, and fossil fuels. The fund issuer may engage with its portfolio companies on sustainability and governance matters through active dialogue, exercising shareholder rights, and encouraging enhanced ESG disclosure and implementation. Up to 20% of the fund's assets may be invested in developed market companies, including ADRs and GDRs.
Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$25.15
Average Daily Volume
1,300
1
PGJ
PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio
PGJ Description
The PowerShares Golden Dragon China Portfolio (Fund) is based on the NASDAQ Golden Dragon China Index (Index). The Fund generally will invest at least 90% of its total assets in equity securities of companies deriving a majority of their revenues from the People’s Republic of China and that comprise the Underlying Index. The Underlying Index is composed of US exchange-listed companies that are headquartered or incorporated in the People’s Republic of China. The Fund and the Index are rebalanced and reconstituted quarterly.Grade (RS Rating)
Last Trade
$28.21
Average Daily Volume
62,777
52
Performance
| Period | MEMS | PGJ |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Days | 0.00% | 19.69% |
| 60 Days | 0.00% | 11.72% |
| 90 Days | 15.28% | |
| 12 Months | 10.99% |
1 Overlapping Holdings
| Symbol | Grade | Weight in MEMS | Weight in PGJ | Overlap | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YMM | B | 4.38% | 3.09% | 3.09% |
MEMS Overweight 0 Positions Relative to PGJ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight |
|---|
MEMS Underweight 51 Positions Relative to PGJ
| Symbol | Grade | Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TCOM | B | -8.48% | |
| BABA | C | -8.18% | |
| BIDU | D | -7.37% | |
| YUMC | D | -6.71% | |
| NTES | C | -5.75% | |
| JD | C | -5.45% | |
| TME | B | -4.88% | |
| BEKE | C | -4.67% | |
| ZTO | C | -4.1% | |
| HTHT | C | -3.62% | |
| NIO | D | -3.5% | |
| BZ | B | -3.4% | |
| VIPS | D | -3.19% | |
| TAL | C | -2.89% | |
| LI | F | -2.27% | |
| QFIN | B | -1.58% | |
| IQ | C | -1.43% | |
| ATHM | C | -1.07% | |
| MNSO | C | -1.03% | |
| XPEV | D | -0.91% | |
| BILI | C | -0.89% | |
| HOLI | F | -0.81% | |
| RLX | C | -0.78% | |
| DQ | F | -0.77% | |
| CSIQ | F | -0.63% | |
| ATAT | D | -0.62% | |
| GOTU | B | -0.6% | |
| MOMO | D | -0.59% | |
| JKS | F | -0.57% | |
| FINV | C | -0.55% | |
| WB | D | -0.49% | |
| ZLAB | D | -0.45% | |
| GDS | C | -0.4% | |
| EH | C | -0.38% | |
| TIGR | C | -0.29% | |
| NOAH | C | -0.28% | |
| QD | F | -0.26% | |
| HUYA | B | -0.24% | |
| SOHU | C | -0.22% | |
| VNET | D | -0.16% | |
| KC | D | -0.15% | |
| LX | C | -0.15% | |
| DDL | D | -0.13% | |
| API | C | -0.12% | |
| DADA | F | -0.12% | |
| TUYA | C | -0.12% | |
| ZH | D | -0.11% | |
| CAN | F | -0.11% | |
| DOYU | C | -0.1% | |
| DAO | F | -0.08% | |
| IMAB | F | -0.07% |
MEMS: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
PGJ: Top Represented Industries & Keywords
Compare ETFs
